Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Andréanne Larouche

89 words · 5 sentences · 6 clauses

Replying to Vincent Ho (Conservative)
“Mr. Speaker, while Mexico is already at the negotiating table with the United States, Canada has not held serious negotiations for months now. The Liberal Prime Minister likes to tout himself as a serious person, but Canadians are starting to see that there is nothing serious about his approach on trade with the U.S. First, he says our relationship with the U.S. is ruptured and then it is a mutual success. He twists into a pretzel and says our historical ties with the U.S. have been a vulnerability, but now we are “stronger together” with the U.S. Behind all of the illusions and Liberal rhetoric, the reality is that 2.6 million Canadian jobs depend on resolving these tariffs. That means millions of paycheques, mortgages and rent payments and millions of families putting food on the table. Why do you think the Liberal Prime Minister has allowed Canada to be sidelined and allowed Canadians to fall further behind while other countries move ahead?”
Statement grade
A
Average 94 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 38%Reasoning 22%The question 39%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 34 wordsthis government was elected last year by leading people to believe that it would resolve this conflict with the wave of a magic wand.1 Here we are, one year later, stuck in this situation. Reasoning · 20 wordsWe must act now, because negotiations with the Americans have indeed been dragging on.2 This continues to have negative impacts. The question · 35 wordsNow that we see that the government has not moved forward or advanced negotiations in the past year and that businesses need help, I would like to know whether the Conservatives will support our motion.Partly on point

Analysed on