Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Jean-Denis Garon

117 words · 5 sentences · 8 clauses

Replying to Mario Simard (Bloc Québécois)
“Mr. Speaker, I know that my colleague from Mirabel also sees the blatant unfairness in what the government is doing, since it has a double standard when it comes to the oil and gas sector versus sectors specific to Quebec. We saw that the government’s response has been very slow, particularly in the economic statement. We see the astronomical amounts being given to the oil and gas sector. I often think that if only a fraction of the obscene amounts given to the oil and gas sector went to the forestry or aluminum sectors, we would be in a much stronger position. I would like to hear what my colleague, who is highly knowledgeable about economics, has to say about this.”
Statement grade
A
Average 92 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 62%Aside 13%Positioning 16%Procedure 9%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 73 wordsif there is one sector that does not need government support, it is the energy sector, particularly in the west. I believe that the oil companies are getting about $10 billion a year in subsidies for small modular reactors that make it possible to produce even more oil.12 The accelerated capital cost allowance has also been expanded to include enhanced oil recovery, 3which basically involves injecting CO2 underground to extract even more oil. Mr. Speaker, Aside · 15 wordsI know that you like oil, Motive imputedand I am not stopping you from liking oil, Motive imputedPositioning · 19 wordsbut it is the subsidies to oil companies that are problematic and that could be put to better use.Positioning Procedure · 10 wordsThat is why I am happy to talk about them.Procedure

Analysed on