← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 77. The grade is held to 69, 30 above Relevance. 69 / 100, held down by Relevance
Signal
81 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
39 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
88 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 85% Positioning 15%
Structure · 3 steps
Claims · 1
Echo · 3 repeated lines
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 68 words once again, establishing Canadian sovereign space launch capabilities would drive billions of dollars in investments. It would create well-paying jobs. It would increase Canada’s sovereignty. It would reduce our reliance on the United States. It would support a commercial space launch and re-entry industry that could be worth up to $40 billion. 1 European countries are lining up to work with us. This is what we are investing in. Partly on point Vague promise Positioning · 12 words I am not sure what the Conservatives are up to at all. Positioning Off point
At a glance
Lost points for Partly on point ×7 Vague promise Positioning Off point Didn't answer None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked. Echo ×6 “Establishing Canadian sovereign space launch capabilities will drive billions in investments.” Said 6 times by 2 members. Every time it was said → Echo ×5 “Reduce our dependence on the United States.” Said 5 times by 3 members. Every time it was said → Echo ×5 “It is going to support a commercial space launch and re-entry industry that could be worth up to $40 billion.” Said 5 times by 2 members. Every time it was said →
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 81
1 of 10 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “I am not sure what the Conservatives are up to at all.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 39
8 of 10 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the question asked.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “once again, establishing Canadian sovereign space launch capabilities would drive billions of dollars in investments.” About the benefits of sovereign space launch, not the documents the release of which was asked for.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “It would create well-paying jobs.” About job creation from space launch, not the requested lease documents.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “It would increase Canada’s sovereignty.” About sovereignty gains from space launch, not the requested lease documents.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “It would reduce our reliance on the United States.” About reliance on the United States, not the requested lease documents.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “It would support a commercial space launch and re-entry industry that could be worth up to $40 billion.” About the commercial value of a launch industry, not the requested lease documents.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “European countries are lining up to work with us.” About European interest in partnering, not the requested lease documents.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “This is what we are investing in.” States a general investment aim without addressing the documents asked for.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I am not sure what the Conservatives are up to at all.” A speculation about the Conservatives’ motives, not an answer on the lease documents.
Respect · 100
0 of 10 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 88
1 of 10 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Vague promise A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible. What the tags mean → “This is what we are investing in” The speaker asserts his side is investing with no measure, amount, or action named.
Echo · 3 repeated lines
Words members of Parliament keep repeating, found by the same rule for every member. No score depends on it.
“Establishing Canadian sovereign space launch capabilities will drive billions in investments.” Said 6 times by 2 members. Every time it was said → “Reduce our dependence on the United States.” Said 5 times by 3 members. Every time it was said → “It is going to support a commercial space launch and re-entry industry that could be worth up to $40 billion.” Said 5 times by 2 members. Every time it was said →
Claims · 1
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “could be worth up to $40 billion” The commercial space launch and re-entry industry Canada could support is estimated to be worth up to $40 billion. search
