Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Doug Eyolfson

41 words · 3 sentences · 5 clauses

Replying to Kelly McCauley (Conservative)
“Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank my colleague from Winnipeg West; we share the “west” part of our ridings. I appreciate the member’s speech and I honestly believe that he means well, he cares for people and he is not out here pushing the government’s slogans. One of the issues he brought up was the grocery rebate. The way it is formulated, if we have a husband and wife, a mother and father, or two adults with up to four kids earning pennies above minimum wage in Manitoba, they would be earning too much and would not receive the grocery rebate. The way the government has it set up pushes most of the rebate into the hands of single earners, single families without children. Can my colleague comment on that being the government’s priority, not helping low-income families, which is the way the program is set up?”
Statement grade
A
Average 94 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Thanks 22%Claims 78%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Thanks · 9 wordsI thank the hon. member for his kind words.Thanks Claims · 32 wordsThis benefit is meant to give maximum relief to the lowest-income Canadians, and that is what it does. It is not a one-size-fits-all answer, but it is targeted toward the lowest-income Canadians.

Analysed on