Analysis · Reply to a comment · beta

Mel Arnold

Conservative on Business of Supply 2026-05-07

75 words · 5 sentences · 7 clauses

Replying to Chris Warkentin (Conservative)

“Mr. Speaker, I would like to give notice, under Standing Order 43(2)(a), that all remaining Conservative caucus speaking slots will be divided in two.”

Statement grade

A+

Average 100 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 85%The question 15%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 64 wordsI want to again quote what the Prime Minister stated earlier this week in the House: “All federal agreements with first nations, with indigenous peoples and with rights holders protect private property rights and protect indigenous peoples’ rights.”¹ I checked those agreements this morning. As I stated, the Musqueam agreement does not mention the term “private property”.² None of those agreements mention private property.³ The question · 11 wordsWas the Prime Minister misleading the House, or was he ill-informed?

At a glance

Nothing lost points.

Choose a measurement above to see how it scored.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

Nothing lost points on Signal.

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Relevance · 100

Nothing lost points on Relevance.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the comment put to the member, and the motion under debate.

Respect · 100

Nothing lost points on Respect.

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Clarity · 100

Nothing lost points on Clarity.

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Claims · 3

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1““All federal agreements with first nations, with indigenous peoples and with rights holders protect private property rights and protect indigenous peoples’ rights.””The Prime Minister stated in the House earlier this week that ‘All federal agreements with first nations, with indigenous peoples and with rights holders protect private property rights and protect indigenous peoples’ rights.’search
2“the Musqueam agreement does not mention the term “private property””The Musqueam Rights Recognition Agreement does not mention the term ‘private property’.search
3“None of those agreements mention private property.”None of the federal agreements with First Nations referenced in the Prime Minister’s statement this week mention private property.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20