Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Sherry Romanado

127 words · 7 sentences · 8 clauses

Replying to Yves Perron (Bloc Québécois)
“Mr. Speaker, my colleague is quite correct to say that this is not, and must never become, a partisan issue. I would like to ask her a question that touches a bit on the topic discussed by my Conservative colleague earlier. Can my colleague explain why, after the Liberal government became a majority, it scrapped every amendment proposed by the Bloc Québécois, the Conservative Party and the NDP? To me, things seem to be taking a partisan turn. In any case, if not partisan, it is strange. Does this mean that the Liberal government has a corner on the truth and does not need to work in collaboration with the opposition parties?”
Statement grade
B
75 / 100, held down by Relevance
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 91%Promise 9%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 108 wordsas I said, the Standing Committee on Veterans Affairs submitted a report in 2024 after hearing from more than 100 witnesses.1 The committee drafted a recommendation to the House to do exactly what we are doing now through Bill C-11.2 We listened to the victims and to the recommendations of a number of Supreme Court justices. The chief of the defence staff also spoke with over 14,000 CAF members.3 I spoke with current CAF members myself and asked them to send me their recommendations. They are concerned that bad habits could resurface if the days when CAF performed the analyses and led the legal proceedings were to return. Promise · 12 wordsWe told them unequivocally that we were going to implement recommendation five, Claims · 7 wordswhich is precisely what we are doing.Partly on point

Analysed on