MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT

Sherry Romanado

Follow by RSS

Romanado pushes Bill C-11 to move sexual misconduct cases out of the military chain of command to civilian authorities, and defends defence spending, including a 10-year, $200-million space launch agreement near Canso, Nova Scotia. She argues from reports and testimony, repeating Justice Arbour’s finding that the choice between military and civilian courts is “a false choice.” The mother of three serving members, she speaks of the Forces as family.Written by AI from their statements. Updated .

Average grade
B–
72 / 100 over 39 statements
Signal 79 / 100
Relevance 63 / 100
Respect 99 / 100
Clarity 87 / 100
Averaged over the 39 of 49 statements graded so far.

In their own words

Statements 49

Government Orders ·

Strengthening Canada's Defence Sector Act

“Nova Scotia has a large military community and defence industry. Our armed forces and their families need good support and the right equipment on time. I want the member to explain how we can make sure our soldiers get the gear they need when they need it, so they can focus on their jobs.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, Nova Scotia has over 14,000 members of the Canadian Armed Forces and defence families. It is the number three province in terms of the population of our defence community. Nova Scotia has been punching above its weight in terms of the defence industry. The hon. member talked a lot about what we are going to be procuring, but she also talked a little about how it is important to have not only equipment but also supports for the members of the Canadian Armed Forces and their families. Could she elaborate a little about making sure that we get them the equipment they need when they need it, to make sure that they can focus on the task at hand and not be worrying about whether they have the tools necessary?

“Our past ways of buying military equipment have not worked. I want the member to explain why this new corporation is needed to get Canadian-bought equipment to our troops faster.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, my colleague’s speech was incredible. I know he has continuously supported the members of the Canadian Armed Forces. Atlantic Canada plays a really important role for the Department of National Defence. The member spoke a bit about some of the opportunities that this provides for companies in the defence sector in his riding. Could he elaborate on why doing the same thing we have been doing in the past has not been working, and why it is so important that we put in place a Crown corporation that would allow the men and women in uniform to get the equipment they need faster and, more appropriately, Canada-purchased equipment?

Government Orders ·

Strengthening Canada's Defence Sector Act

“Today is the anniversary of the death of Warrant Officer Patrice Vincent, and my thoughts are with his family. The Coast Guard now helps our military train and share security information with allies. We are also investing heavily in military bases across Canada. Buying military equipment has been hard for past governments, so we need a new way to get our troops what they need.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, before I get to my question, I want to highlight that today is the difficult anniversary of the death of Warrant Officer Patrice Vincent, who was killed back in 2014. Our thoughts are with his family today. The member opposite talked about a couple of things. He asked about the Canadian Coast Guard and the capabilities it brings to the Department of National Defence. One of those capabilities is the ability to actually share security information with our allies, which was not the case when it was under Fisheries and Oceans. It also brings training opportunities to the Canadian Armed Forces. The member also mentioned a question with respect to New Brunswick. I have visited CFB Gagetown, and anyone who had a chance to go visit this summer would have seen the incredible investments happening on bases and wings across Canada. The member mentioned that successive governments had difficulty in terms of getting defence procurement right. Would he not agree that perhaps we need to look at a different way of doing what we do to get those capabilities to our men and women in uniform?

Statements by Members ·

Tragedy at CFB Wainwright

“Four Canadian soldiers died at CFB Wainwright on Saturday. Others were hurt. I want their families and all military personnel to know we support them in their grief.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, on Saturday, four Canadian soldiers tragically lost their lives at CFB Wainwright: Sergeant Morgan Wong, Private Shaun Farrell, Private Aidan Goulding and Private Hayden Lykkemark. Four lives and four families are forever changed. Across Canada, military families watched the news, desperately waiting for a call or a message of just four words: “I am okay, mom.” For some, that message never came. For those whose loved ones are safe, relief is accompanied by heartbreak for the families who were not so fortunate. Across our country, Canadians are praying for the recovery of those injured and for the families keeping vigil at their hospital bedside. I want all military families to know that we share in their grief and that they are not alone. I want all service personnel across the country who are mourning this loss to know that we are holding them in our thoughts. I stand with them in their grief in the difficult days ahead and always. Lest we forget.

Oral Questions ·

Public Services and Procurement

In response to a question from James Bezan

“Our government is investing nearly $8 billion in national defence in Alberta. This includes money for fighter jets, a new lab, a base for air force planes, and base repairs. We support our military members and defence workers there.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 0 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, yesterday the Minister of National Defence was in Alberta to talk about the incredible investments we have been making. At CFB Edmonton, we highlighted nearly $8 billion in defence investment, including nearly $4 billion to support future fighter capabilities at CFB Cold Lake. There is $750 million for a new chemical and biological laboratory at Suffield. There is $550 million to establish the western operating base for the Royal Canadian Air Force’s Husky fleet. There is over $580 million over the next three years for maintenance and repair work across bases in Alberta. There are over 12,000 members of the Canadian Armed Forces and DND employees in Alberta, and we support them.

In response to a question from James Bezan

“The Conservatives always vote against spending money on our military. We are spending over $81 billion on defence over five years, and we met the NATO target early. The member should support this.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 0 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Respect 66 of 100

    This statement targeted a person rather than their actions or views: “the member opposite does not want to talk about”.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, it is very obvious that the member opposite does not want to talk about his lack of support for the Canadian Armed Forces. Every single time we have brought forward defence spending at committee, the Conservative Party has voted against it. Mr. Speaker, in budget 2025, we invested more than $81 billion in defence over the next five years. We have met the NATO target of 2% five years ahead of schedule. I do not understand why the member opposite cannot get on board.

Oral Questions ·

Climate Change

In response to a question from Elizabeth May

“We can protect the environment and still build big projects quickly. We are working with the provinces to speed up reviews and cut duplicate rules, while still keeping strong environmental standards and respecting Indigenous rights.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 45 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, we do not need to choose between strong environmental protections and building major projects efficiently. We can and must do both. That is why we are working with provinces and territories to cut duplication and make assessments more efficient, while upholding Canada’s world-leading environmental standards and respecting indigenous rights. On top of this, we introduced environmental mapping in our nature strategy to integrate conservation and project planning, to keep nature protected and to build Canada right. Our focus remains on building well, streamlining processes and cutting duplication, not corners.

Adjournment Proceedings ·

Adjournment Proceedings

In response to a question from Michael Cooper

“Canada needs its own way to launch rockets into space. We are the only G7 country that cannot do this on our own. Our government is spending money to fix this, build our space industry, and create good Canadian jobs.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 45 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
  • A repeated line

    “Canada is the only G7 country without sovereign launch capabilities.”

    Said 3 times by 3 members since April 28.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Let us be clear, Mr. Speaker. Sovereign space launch capabilities are a strategic imperative for Canada. Canada is currently the only G7 country without sovereign space launch capabilities. We are in the process of addressing that strategic gap. Our approach will enable Canada to exercise more control over essential space infrastructure. This is about building Canada strong. It is about investing in Canadian industry, unlocking the full potential of our innovation economy and creating high-quality jobs here at home. It is about developing the critical infrastructure and capabilities that strengthen our sovereignty, enhance our security and support a more resilient Canadian economy. We will build in Canada, we will invest in Canadian workers and Canadian innovation, and we will ensure Canada remains a strong, sovereign and trusted leader in the space domain.

In response to a question from Michael Cooper

“Canada needs the ability to launch its own rockets into space so we do not have to rely on other countries. We followed all ethics and safety rules when signing the deal with Maritime Launch Services. Leasing this land in Nova Scotia is a safe, low-risk choice, and 90% of the $200 million will be spent on Canadian workers and businesses.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, this is about how we are developing sovereign capabilities that contribute to Canada’s defence and security, our economy and our future. One example is sovereign space launch capability, which is clearly set out in Canada’s very first defence industrial strategy. Canada is the only G7 country without sovereign space launch capability. For a country with such a long and successful history in the space sector, this is a strategic shortcoming. Space-based systems now underpin essential military, government and civilian services. Having our own launch capability gives Canada greater control over how and when we put critical infrastructure into orbit. Last year, the Department of National Defence looked at available domestic options and considered a range of factors, including regulatory readiness, geographic suitability, operational requirements and the overall ability to support Canada’s long-term space objectives. Maritime Launch Services met the necessary environmental and aeronautical safety requirements. The company also demonstrated a level of readiness that aligned with broader defence and economic objectives in the defence industrial strategy. As with any decision related to government procurement, the Department of National Defence entered into this agreement in accordance with the established rules regarding ethics, conflicts of interest and accountability. The hon. member also questioned the value of this investment. However, this is about much more than just access to a piece of land. This investment seeks to give Canada the infrastructure necessary to conduct launches from our own soil. It also seeks to reduce our dependence on foreign suppliers and to strengthen our capacity to manage our space capabilities independently. After weighing the options, we deemed the use of provincial Crown land as an appropriate and low-risk way to provide secure access to a launch site while at the same time avoiding the additional costs, delays and challenges associated with any federal land acquisition process. The site near Canso, Nova Scotia, offers some important advantages, such as access to open ocean, which is desirable for space launches. It also offers a full range of launch trajectories for earth observation, communications satellites and future defence activities. The investment also creates economic opportunities. Our agreement with MLS requires that 90% of the project funding be spent in Canada or with Canadian-owned businesses. This will ensure that the vast majority of this $200-million investment will support Canadian workers and communities. Canada is seeing record investments in space sector research and development from these companies, and projects like this signal that Canada is laying the foundation to support those investments and ensure future opportunities. This project also provides Canada with the opportunity to offer space launch services both commercially and to our allies. We can be proud of Canada’s legacy in space. From the Canadarm to advanced satellite technologies, generations of Canadians have consistently been at the forefront of innovation and exploration. Building Canada strong means investing in the technologies that will shape the future. Canada’s growing space sector is creating good jobs, strengthening sovereignty and ensuring that Canadians remain leaders in innovation for decades to come.

Oral Questions ·

National Defence

In response to a question from Jacques Gourde

“We are spending billions of dollars on new ships and submarines for the navy. This is the largest investment in the Canadian navy since World War II.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 45 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, we are strengthening the Royal Canadian Navy from coast to coast to coast, with billions of dollars in investments in the context of one of the largest shipbuilding programs. This is the largest investment in the Royal Canadian Navy since the Second World War. It includes six Arctic and offshore patrol ships, 15 Canadian combat ships, two joint support ships and up to 12 submarines. The Government of Canada is proud to make generational investments in the Canadian Armed Forces.

Government Orders ·

Build Canada Homes Act

“The opposition is wrong to say no homes have been built. I saw 30 new transitional homes open in my riding this March. We are building homes so more Canadians can find a place to live.”
  • Question or comment in debate

    Clarity 45 of 100

    Much of this statement used imprecise wording, lacked details on timing or responsibility, or made broad claims without support.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I know we are talking about Building Canada Homes and creating this stand-alone agency, and the previous speaker mentioned that no homes have actually been built. I was at the inauguration of a building in my riding in March with 30 units for transitional housing, so I have seen in my own riding that we are building. We are building to make sure that we provide the supply to allow more Canadians to find a place to live and to buy their first home. As such, I am not quite sure why the members opposite are saying no homes are being built, when I know for a fact that in my riding there have been. In fact, Longueuil was actually identified as one of the six projects initially announced.

Government Orders ·

Main Estimates, 2026-27

“We do have a defence plan, and it lists 10 key military needs for Canada. I want the member to share what people in her area are saying about those needs.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank my colleague for her support for members of the Canadian Armed Forces and their families. The member spoke a lot about the defence industrial strategy, and a previous question suggested that there was no defence strategy. In fact, in the defence industrial strategy, it clearly indicates the 10 sovereign capabilities that Canada has indicated very clearly with respect to what they are looking for in terms of procurement and our own sovereignty. I would ask the member to elaborate a bit about what she is hearing on the ground in her riding with respect to those 10 sovereign capabilities.

Government Orders ·

Business of Supply

“We both want young people to be able to stay in their home province, get good jobs, and raise families. Our new plan funds job training so they can learn skills to build homes. Does the member agree this will help them stay?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I had a chance to visit the hon. member’s riding a couple of years ago. It is a beautiful riding with phenomenal people. I was listening to her speech quite intently. She mentioned something that I think we can all agree with. No one wants young people to have to leave their home to find work. I think that all of us want to make sure that young people who want to stay in their home province, find a good job and be able to settle and have a family have that opportunity. With that, I know that we recently brought forward the team Canada strong plan in the spring economic statement, which will allow for apprenticeship training and some opportunities to allow young people to get the skill set they need to help build the homes that the member is referring to. Would she agree that this could be a good initiative in terms of helping young people stay in their home province?

“People in my riding want Canadians to work together through our current trade and world challenges. I want to ask the member if people in his riding are saying the same thing, instead of focusing on our economic problems.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I do not know if my colleague has been hearing the same thing I have been hearing in my riding. I hear people saying they understand that Canada is facing a lot of challenges with respect to geopolitics, with respect to trade and so forth. They want Canadians to stick together and to work together for the benefit of all Canadians. The member alluded to how this debate today has been about almost celebrating Canada’s difficulties in terms of the economy. Can the member let us know if he is hearing the same thing from constituents that I am with respect to working together for the benefit of Canadians?

“I want to know if the member supports our government's programs to train young people for apprenticeships.”
  • Question or comment in debate

    Relevance 0 of 100

    None of this question addressed the preceding speech or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I have not had a chance to work with the member opposite yet here in this Parliament. I would like to ask for her thoughts with respect to the supports that we have been providing for young people, including in the spring economic statement in terms of providing training opportunities for young people. I think that she mentioned some young people in her speech and the importance of supporting young people. I would like to know if she would support those initiatives, in terms of helping train young people for apprenticeships.

Oral Questions ·

Aerospace Industry

In response to a question from Branden Leslie

“We need to invest in our military space program. It protects our satellites, helps our armed forces, and gives Canada control over launching things into space. Our allies want us to do this, and I do not understand why the opposition does not support it.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 100 of 100

    Of this answer, 100% addressed the question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, as someone who has the Canadian Space Agency in Longueuil, I do not understand why the member opposite is not supporting space domain awareness. This is incredibly important. Our job is to make sure that our forces are ready and resilient when operating in the space domain. We are standing up 3 Canadian Space Division, which will ensure space domain awareness, defend and protect our satellites, and deliver space power in support of military operations. This will allow Canada to have sovereignty in terms of our ability to launch satellites into space. Our allies are asking for this. I do not understand what the problem is.

In response to a question from Branden Leslie

“Canada needs to be able to launch its own spacecraft. It helps our military, tracks wildfires, creates jobs, and brings in billions of dollars. I do not understand why the Conservatives oppose this.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 39 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, establishing Canadian sovereignty of space launch capabilities is essential for us, not only in terms of our defence capabilities, but also in terms of our ability to detect wildfires and atmospheric issues. This is incredibly important for Canada. The premier of Nova Scotia is in support. The industry is in support. This is going to generate billions of dollars in economic returns and create jobs. I do not understand why the Conservatives are against innovation.

Oral Questions ·

National Defence

In response to a question from Bruce Fanjoy

“We will set up an independent board to review medals for Afghanistan veterans. It will look at new evidence to see if any veterans should receive the Victoria Cross.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, honouring bravery and sacrifice in service to Canada is among our government’s most solemn responsibilities. We are profoundly grateful to all those who have served and who continue to serve our country. Military honours, including Canada’s Victoria Cross, are subject to a thorough and rigorous review process by the Canadian Armed Forces. I can confirm that the government agrees to the establishment of an independent military honours review board to review Afghanistan veteran cases where new evidence may suggest that the criteria for the Victoria Cross may have been met. I look forward to providing further updates to this House in due course.

Oral Questions ·

Aerospace Industry

In response to a question from Jason Groleau

“We are investing in Canada's ability to launch our own spacecraft. It will bring in billions of dollars, create good jobs, and make us less dependent on the United States.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 0 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
  • A repeated line

    “Reduce our dependence on the United States.”

    Said 5 times by 3 members since May 6.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, establishing sovereign space launch capabilities in Canada will generate billions of dollars in investment, create well-paying jobs, strengthen Canada’s sovereignty, reduce our dependence on the United States, and support a commercial space launch and re-entry sector. This could represent as much as $40 billion. That is what we are investing in. These are essential capabilities that protect Canada and generate significant economic benefits for Canadians.

Oral Questions ·

Aerospace Industry

In response to a question from Michael Cooper

“We are investing in Canada's ability to launch our own spacecraft. This will create jobs, protect the country, and make us less reliant on the United States.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 46 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
  • A repeated line

    “These are essential capabilities that protect Canada and create massive economic benefits for Canadians.”

    Said 5 times by 2 members since April 24.

    Every time it was said
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, establishing sovereign space launch capabilities in Canada will drive billions of dollars in investment, create good-paying jobs, increase Canada’s sovereignty, reduce our reliance on the United States and support a commercial space launch and re-entry sector that could be worth up to $40 billion dollars. That is what we are investing in. These are essential capabilities that protect Canada and create massive economic benefits for Canadians.