← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Respect and Clarity. Average 100 / 100
Signal
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 90% The question 10%
Structure · 3 steps
Claims · 3
Echo · said 4 times
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 75 words because the Liberal government directed its lawyers to not argue property rights in the Cowichan case , British Columbians who bought their homes, paid their mortgages and followed the law now do not know the status of their home ownership.1 The Liberal government directive number 14 is still in place.2 This means that the legal instruction for federal lawyers to not defend property rights remains in place today.3 British Columbians need certainty of their home ownership. The question · 8 words Will the Prime Minister reverse directive 14 today?
At a glance
Echo ×4 “Because the Liberal government directed its lawyers not to argue for property rights in the Cowichan case.” Said 4 times by 3 members. Every time it was said →
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 100
Nothing lost points on Signal.
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Respect · 100
Nothing lost points on Respect.
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Clarity · 100
Nothing lost points on Clarity.
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Echo · 1 repeated line
Words members of Parliament keep repeating, found by the same rule for every member. No score depends on it.
“Because the Liberal government directed its lawyers not to argue for property rights in the Cowichan case.” Said 4 times by 3 members. Every time it was said →
Claims · 3
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “the Liberal government directed its lawyers to not argue property rights in the Cowichan case” The Liberal government directed its lawyers not to argue property rights in the Cowichan case. search 2 “directive number 14 is still in place” Federal directive number 14, the instruction to federal lawyers not to defend property rights, remained in place as of May 8, 2026. search 3 “the legal instruction for federal lawyers to not defend property rights remains in place today” The legal instruction for federal lawyers not to defend property rights remained in place as of May 8, 2026. search
