Analysis · Question Period question · beta

Christine Normandin

Bloc Québécois on Intergovernmental Relations 2026-05-25

104 words · 7 sentences · 10 clauses

Statement grade

Average 94 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Reasoning 39%Claims 44%Positioning 12%The question 4%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Reasoning · 17 wordscontempt is when one considers a person, group or thing inferior. It is a feeling of superiority. Claims · 46 wordsWhen the government of a province or Quebec asks its people a question, it is up to the Government of Quebec or that provincial government to decide on the question, and it is up to the people to answer it. Ottawa has no business getting involved. Positioning · 13 wordsOttawa is interfering simply because it believes itself to be superior to everyone.Positioning Reasoning · 24 wordsThere are two options: Either Ottawa respects the democratic process that is under way, or it interferes and confirms its contempt for the people. The question · 4 wordsWhat will it do?

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 83

1 of 1 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “Ottawa is interfering simply because it believes itself to be superior to everyone.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 0

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

No checkable claims.

Analysed on 2026-10-20