Analysis · Question Period question · beta

Michelle Rempel Garner

Conservative on Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship 2026-05-25

126 words · 3 sentences · 8 clauses

Statement grade

Average 91 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 44%Positioning 19%Reasoning 17%The question 20%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 55 wordson Thursday, the Minister of Immigration is supposed to show up for four hours to be held to account for her decisions during the committee of the whole, ¹but she has not confirmed that she will attend or that she will answer questions for the full four hours, as her colleague, the finance minister, did.² Positioning · 24 wordsI understand that she is scared to be held to account for the atrocious dumpster fire she has presided over for the last year, Motive imputedReasoning · 22 wordsbut she has a job to do, and if she will not do it, the Prime Minister needs to finally fire her. The question · 25 wordsWill the Minister of Immigration commit to answering questions for the full four hours on Thursday night, or will the Prime Minister finally fire her?

At a glance

Lost points for
Personal attackThis statement targeted a person rather than their actions or views: “she is scared to be held to account”.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Nothing lost points.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 74

1 of 1 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Claiming to know a person’s bad motives.What the tags mean “she is scared to be held to account”It attributes a state of mind (fear) to the minister as fact rather than judging her conduct.

Clarity · 100

0 of 1 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 2

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“on Thursday, the Minister of Immigration is supposed to show up for four hours”The Minister of Immigration is scheduled to appear for four hours before the committee of the whole on Thursday, May 28, 2026.search
2“as her colleague, the finance minister, did”The finance minister appeared before the committee of the whole and answered questions for the full four hours.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20