Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Scot Davidson

72 words · 7 sentences · 7 clauses

Replying to Kevin Lamoureux (Liberal)
“Mr. Speaker, the member talked about reality at the very beginning, and he needs a reality shake. We can look at the holistic approach of this government in the last year, with a new Prime Minister and a new government, and look at the many initiatives that are actually driving and making a positive difference. I will use one example. The member mocks the idea of a sovereignty fund. Other countries around the world actually have sovereignty funds. The Conservatives do not understand what it is. I have heard the debate, and the Speaker will not allow me enough time to provide the rationale as to why the sovereignty fund, or the Canada strong fund, is a good fund. The Conservative Kool-Aid says no, it is bad, and it is broken. That is all they ever say. They go around Canada, and Canada is—”
Statement grade
B–
Average 70 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 68%Claims 32%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 23 wordsI think my hon. colleague from Winnipeg North has had too much Kool-Aid today.Insult That is a government that is out of touch.Positioning Claims · 9 wordsThis so-called sovereign wealth fund is financed with debt.1 Positioning · 18 wordsThe government does not understand the way things work. The Liberals talk about imaginary taxes all the time.Positioning Claims · 14 wordsThey say the industrial carbon tax does not drive up the price of things. Positioning · 8 wordsThat is how upside down the Liberals are.PositioningOff point

Analysed on