← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 80. The grade is held to 77, 30 above Relevance. 77 / 100, held down by Relevance
Signal
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
47 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
71 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 78% Reasoning 22%
Structure · 3 steps
Claims · 1
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Madam Chair, Claims · 45 words my colleague will be happy to hear that we have made generational investments in housing, and in particular with respect to affordable housing. He will know about Build Canada Homes.1 This is the agency that is going to build more affordable homes in this country, Vague promise Reasoning · 13 words and that is going to be a key pillar of affordability for families. Partly on point
At a glance
Lost points for Partly on point ×5 Vague promise Didn't answer None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 100
0 of 6 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Nothing lost points.
Relevance · 47
5 of 6 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the motion under debate.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “my colleague will be happy to hear that we have made generational investments in housing,” About past housing investments generally, not when the promised 500,000 homes will be built.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “and in particular with respect to affordable housing.” About affordable housing generally, not the timeline for the homes asked about.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “He will know about Build Canada Homes.” Names a housing agency but does not address the question of when 500,000 homes will be built.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “This is the agency that is going to build more affordable homes in this country,” About the agency’s purpose of building affordable homes, not the timeline asked for.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “and that is going to be a key pillar of affordability for families.” About affordability for families generally, not the housing target or its timing.
Respect · 100
0 of 6 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 71
1 of 6 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Vague promise A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible. What the tags mean → “is going to build more affordable homes in this country” The commitment names no number, date or measure of how many homes will be built.
Claims · 1
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “Build Canada Homes” A federal agency called Build Canada Homes exists. search
