Analysis · Debate reply · beta

François-Philippe Champagne

58 words · 3 sentences · 5 clauses

Replying to Michael Barrett (Conservative)
“Mr. Chair, the minister told Canadians that he had a conflict of interest screen because he believed there would be one if he participated in debates, discussions, decisions or votes related to Alto, but the minister’s department then hired an outside contractor for the budget who appears to have been connected to Alto. Did a conflict of interest screen apply to that contractor?”
Statement grade
F
30 / 100, held down by Signal
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 100%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Chair, Positioning · 58 wordsmy colleague is an experienced man. He is a very talented parliamentarian, Partly on pointbut he is making a lot of allegations. I know that his legal training should lead him to be cautious in what he says and in the allegations he makes against his colleagues, who are all honourable members of the House, as well as their families.PositioningOff point

Analysed on