“Mr. Chair, this is a different question. The question is about a contractor who worked on the budget speech. My understanding is that this is separate from your letter in September. It was a contract worth $12,168. I would encourage you to use your officials who are here in the chamber with you. The contract identified a vendor. The vendor’s last name is Émond, and I am wondering if the minister can confirm that this contract was awarded. It is open-source. It is published online: $12,168 to help with the budget presentation and speech. Can he confirm that?”
Statement grade
A+
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity.
Average 97 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Reasoning 96%Procedure 4%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Chair, Reasoning · 24 wordsI do not understand the nature of the question.Partly on pointIf my colleague already has the answer, I do not see the point of asking.Procedure · 3 wordsAs he says, ProcedureReasoning · 50 wordsif the information is in the public domain, he will have the opportunity to obtain all the information he needs.We are here to answer any questions, but when it comes to questions involving information that is in the public domain, I believe my colleague is capable of obtaining it.
