Analysis · Debate reply · beta

François-Philippe Champagne

91 words · 7 sentences · 7 clauses

Replying to Melissa Lantsman (Conservative)
“Mr. Chair, I will put it into context. For every dollar of foreign investment that came into Canada during that decade, two dollars left this country. It is not because of global issues. It is not because of the tariffs. Tariffs were not an issue then. It is a domestic policy failure that the minister cannot admit he was a part of. Does he accept responsibility, any responsibility, for his role in a trillion dollars leaving this country?”
Statement grade
A
Average 94 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 80%Reasoning 20%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Chair, Claims · 22 wordsCanadians should take credit for being the country that has attracted the largest amount of foreign investment in the last 20 years.1 Reasoning · 18 wordsIt is not about government. It is about workers. It is about industry. It is about this country. Claims · 51 wordsWhat we have been doing is building the conditions for Canada to stand out in the world.Vague promise I would remind my colleague that if she looked at the uncertainty index of the International Monetary Fund, she would see we are at one of the highest levels since the Second World War.2

Analysed on