← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 87. The grade is held to 77, 30 above Relevance. 77 / 100, held down by Relevance
Signal
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
47 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 90% Reasoning 10%
Structure · 3 steps
Claims · 2
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Chair, Claims · 65 words I am happy to say that the foreign direct investment inflow in Canada in 2025 was $97 billion.1 Investors around the world see what Canada has to offer. We have one of the most educated workforces. We have very strong industry. We have critical minerals. We have energy, and we are the only country in the G7 with free trade with all other G7 nations.2 Reasoning · 7 words We have what we need to succeed. Partly on point
At a glance
Lost points for Partly on point ×8 Didn't answer None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 100
0 of 8 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Nothing lost points.
Relevance · 47
8 of 8 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the motion under debate.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “I am happy to say that the foreign direct investment inflow in Canada in 2025 was $97 billion.” Gives a figure on foreign direct investment coming in, not the amount of capital leaving for U.S. projects that was asked about.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Investors around the world see what Canada has to offer.” About investors’ view of Canada generally, not the capital outflow to the U.S. asked about.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “We have one of the most educated workforces.” About Canada’s workforce, not the question of capital leaving for U.S. projects.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “We have very strong industry.” About Canada’s industry strength, not the capital outflow asked about.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “We have critical minerals.” About Canada’s critical minerals, not the capital outflow asked about.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “We have energy,” About Canada’s energy sector, not the capital outflow asked about.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “and we are the only country in the G7 with free trade with all other G7 nations.” About Canada’s trade position, not the capital outflow asked about.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “We have what we need to succeed.” A general claim about Canada’s prospects, not the capital outflow asked about.
Respect · 100
0 of 8 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 100
0 of 8 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 2
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “the foreign direct investment inflow in Canada in 2025 was $97 billion” Canada’s foreign direct investment inflow in 2025 was $97 billion. search 2 “the only country in the G7 with free trade with all other G7 nations” Canada is the only G7 country that has free trade agreements with every other G7 nation. search
