← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity. Average 77 / 100
Signal
63 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
47 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 33% Claims 67%
Structure · 6 steps
Claims · 1
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Chair, Positioning · 10 words I would invite my colleague to speak to global CEOs. Positioning Claims · 32 words He would be pleased to hear that they very much value investments in Canada. When I travel and speak to global CEOs, they see why Canada is the place to invest in. Positioning · 7 words We just have to follow the dollars, Positioning Claims · 12 words and we are seeing large investments, like the one Shell made recently.1 Positioning · 5 words They speak with their dollars. Positioning Partly on point
At a glance
Lost points for Partly on point ×6 Positioning ×3
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 63
3 of 9 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “I would invite my colleague to speak to global CEOs.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We just have to follow the dollars,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “They speak with their dollars.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 47
6 of 9 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the motion under debate.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “I would invite my colleague to speak to global CEOs.” Invites the member to consult CEOs about investment appeal, not the Finance estimates or the approval timeline asked about.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “He would be pleased to hear that they very much value investments in Canada.” About CEOs valuing investment in Canada, not whether approval timelines are shorter than in the United States.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “When I travel and speak to global CEOs, they see why Canada is the place to invest in.” About the minister’s conversations with CEOs, not the estimates under consideration or the timeline comparison.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “We just have to follow the dollars,” A general remark about following investment dollars, not the estimates or the point raised.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “and we are seeing large investments, like the one Shell made recently.” Cites Shell’s investment as an example of investor interest, not the approval timeline asked about or the Finance estimates.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “They speak with their dollars.” A general comment about investors speaking with their dollars, not the estimates or the timeline question.
Respect · 100
0 of 9 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 100
0 of 9 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 1
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “the one Shell made recently” Shell made a large investment recently. search
