Analysis · Debate reply · beta

François-Philippe Champagne

97 words · 7 sentences · 9 clauses

Replying to Melissa Lantsman (Conservative)
“Mr. Chair, that answer is condescending and it does not show that he, as finance minister, understands what foreign direct investment is. It means a foreign company buying a Canadian one. Strategic decisions are moved abroad. The intellectual property moves abroad. The profits move abroad. He knows that as the finance minister. Again, he is treating those in the House like we are stupid. C.D. Howe finds mergers and acquisitions generally do not create new jobs or investments, so why is the minister celebrating in the House the hollowing out of the Canadian economy?”
Statement grade
A+
Average 95 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 14%Claims 86%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Chair, Positioning · 14 wordsa good Conservative, Positioningwhich I know my colleague is, would celebrate an open economy.Mockery Claims · 83 wordsCanada has an open economy where we welcome investment in our country. We have seen these investments that have grown the GDP in this country. They have created jobs. Let us think about Volkswagen if they want to talk about the auto sector. It is the largest gigafactory outside of Europe.1 European manufacturers are choosing to come to Canada, just like a number of investors, such as Shell and LNG Canada, 2and they are creating opportunities, jobs, growth and wealth in this country.

Analysed on