Analysis · Debate reply · beta

François-Philippe Champagne

71 words · 4 sentences · 5 clauses

Replying to Kyle Seeback (Conservative)
“Yes, Mr. Chair, I am splitting my time. I asked the minister about a zero-emission vehicle mandate, and he did not answer. I am assuming it is because the minister did not know the answer. In fact, the regulations that the government has put forward actually mean that only a fully electric vehicle will meet the tailpipe emissions target by 2035. Will he agree with me that this is a zero-emission vehicle mandate?”
Statement grade
B
77 / 100, held down by Relevance
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 70%Reasoning 30%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Chair, Claims · 44 wordsas the member will have seen, we have been supporting the industry. We have been making sure that we can attract investments and that we understand the reality of the world today.Unearned certainty When it comes to electric vehicles, there have been delays in adoption, Reasoning · 21 wordsand we need to adopt policies that would favour investment in the auto sector to support our workers and the industry. Claims · 6 wordsThat is what we are doing.Partly on point

Analysed on