← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Respect and Clarity. Average 100 / 100
Signal
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 76% The question 24%
Structure · 3 steps
Claims · 2
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Chair, Claims · 34 words the minister also warned that Chinese EV producers benefit from “unfair, non-market practices” and “don’t respect labour law and environmental laws”, 1 and yet his government is letting in 50,000 Chinese electric vehicles every year.2 The question · 11 words Were his words wrong then, or is his position wrong now?
At a glance
Nothing lost points.
Choose a measurement above to see how it scored.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 100
Nothing lost points on Signal.
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Respect · 100
Nothing lost points on Respect.
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Clarity · 100
Nothing lost points on Clarity.
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Claims · 2
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “warned that Chinese EV producers benefit from “unfair, non-market practices” and “don’t respect labour law and environmental laws”” The minister (Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance) warned that Chinese EV producers benefit from ‘unfair, non-market practices’ and ‘don’t respect labour law and environmental laws’. search 2 “letting in 50,000 Chinese electric vehicles every year” Canada is allowing about 50,000 Chinese electric vehicles into the country every year. search
