“Mr. Chair, I am sorry I had to cut the minister off. He is great, but I have to get in one last question. I see the hon. member for South Shore—St. Margarets, who has done great work on China, on the file around lobsters and working with the government to remove tariffs. I see the hon. member for Labrador and the member for Avalon. I can say that it is fisheries that matter in Atlantic Canada. It is the base of our economy. I would be remiss as a member from Nova Scotia to not ask the minister in the time we have remaining to talk about small craft harbours and a generational investment. Why does the hon. minister not take us away on that happy note?”
Statement grade
F
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 63. The grade is held to 33, 30 above Signal.
33 / 100, held down by Signal
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Anecdote 96%Claims 4%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Chair, Anecdote · 55 wordsI am going to turn my back just for a second to say that the member for South Shore—St.Margarets came to my office to advocate for small craft harbours.1She was there.She put her fist on the table.She said that I needed to listen and that we are going to do something.AnecdoteClaims · 2 wordsWe did—Partly on point