Analysis · Question Period question · beta

Christine Normandin

Bloc Québécois on Justice 2026-05-28

92 words · 4 sentences · 6 clauses

Statement grade

A+

Average 100 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 84%The question 16%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 77 wordsyesterday, the Quebec National Assembly unanimously condemned the Prime Minister for his authoritarian statement that 50% of the votes cast plus one would not be enough in a referendum.¹⁴ It reaffirmed its support for Quebec’s Bill 99, ²which defines a clear majority as 50% plus one, just like all democratic votes around the world.³ It declared that no parliament or government may impose constraint on the democratic will of the Quebec people to determine their own future. The question · 15 wordsDoes the Prime Minister understand Quebec’s message, and will he respect the foundations of democracy?

At a glance

Nothing lost points.

Choose a measurement above to see how it scored.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

Nothing lost points on Signal.

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 100

Nothing lost points on Respect.

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Clarity · 100

Nothing lost points on Clarity.

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Claims · 4

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“his authoritarian statement that 50% of the votes cast plus one would not be enough in a referendum”The Prime Minister made a statement that 50% of the votes cast plus one would not be enough in a referendum.search
2“reaffirmed its support for Quebec’s Bill 99”The Quebec National Assembly reaffirmed its support for Quebec’s Bill 99.search
3“which defines a clear majority as 50% plus one”Quebec’s Bill 99 defines a clear majority as 50% plus one.search
4“unanimously condemned the Prime Minister”The Quebec National Assembly unanimously condemned the Prime Minister.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20