Analysis · Debate question · beta

Kyle Seeback

Conservative on Business of Supply 2026-05-28

96 words · 5 sentences · 5 clauses

Statement grade

A–

Average 87 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Positioning 35%Claims 38%The question 27%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Chair, Positioning · 34 wordsonce again, there is not even an attempt to answer the question. It is insulting to the people whom we represent when we ask these questions and the minister does not try to answer.Positioning Claims · 36 wordsAlberta labour organizations uncovered allegations of workers being paid cash, using forged safety certifications, operating without WCB coverage and being threatened with deportation if they spoke out.¹ This was on a project that received federal dollars.² The question · 26 wordsCan the minister cite one investigation into this going on and one action that her department has taken to crack down on these types of occurrences?

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 60

2 of 2 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “once again, there is not even an attempt to answer the question.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it.What the tags mean “It is insulting to the people whom we represent when we ask these questions and the minister does not try to answer.”Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 100

0 of 2 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 100

0 of 2 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Nothing lost points.

Claims · 2

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“Alberta labour organizations uncovered allegations of workers being paid cash, using forged safety certifications, operating without WCB coverage and being threatened with deportation if they spoke out”Alberta labour organizations uncovered allegations of workers being paid cash, using forged safety certifications, operating without WCB coverage and being threatened with deportation if they spoke out.search
2“This was on a project that received federal dollars”The project where these alleged labour abuses occurred received federal dollars.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20