← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Respect and Clarity. Average 80 / 100
Signal
71 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Respect
69 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 49% Claims 33% The question 18%
Structure · 4 steps
Claims · 2
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Positioning · 41 words this week marks a turning point, with the Prime Minister’s climate betrayal and the Liberals’ election deceit on environmental issues. Positioning The green banker they sold us on is green only in his thirst for wads of cash derived from black gold. Insult Claims · 28 words He is also dragging down all the Liberals who ran on a platform that mentioned the words “climate change” 28 times, 1 but never once mentioned the word “pipeline”.2 The question · 15 words Is there a single Liberal member who will refuse to be complicit in this betrayal?
At a glance
Lost points for Positioning Insult Personal attack This statement targeted a person rather than their actions or views: “green only in his thirst for wads of cash”.
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 71
1 of 2 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “this week marks a turning point, with the Prime Minister’s climate betrayal and the Liberals’ election deceit on environmental issues.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Respect · 69
1 of 2 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Insult An insult aimed at a person. What the tags mean → “green only in his thirst for wads of cash” This attributes personal greed to the Prime Minister himself rather than criticizing his decisions or record.
Clarity · 100
0 of 2 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 2
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “He is also dragging down all the Liberals who ran on a platform that mentioned the words “climate change” 28 times, ” The Liberal Party’s election platform mentioned the words ‘climate change’ 28 times. search 2 “but never once mentioned the word “pipeline”.” The Liberal Party’s election platform did not mention the word ‘pipeline’ at all. search
