“Madam Speaker, as my colleague from La Pointe-de-l’Île said, a lot of climate policies have been walked back. The government ended the carbon tax and, for all intents and purposes, the industrial carbon tax. It is also allowing hydrogen made from methane to be classified as clean hydrogen, granting new oil subsidies, and so on. Despite all this backtracking, including the funding for new pipelines, the government is telling us that it will be able to fulfill its obligations under the Paris Agreement as early as this year. Bloc Québécois members play fair. We criticize, but we ask for figures first. We are asking the government what figures it is basing its claim on. However, there do not seem to be any figures. I would like my colleague to tell me one thing. She was recently a member of the NDP caucus, and I think she was interested in these figures when she was a New Democrat. Now that she is a new member on that side of the House, is she pushing for those figures to be made public?”
Statement grade
–
Not graded: fewer than 4 clauses beyond the address. The scores are shown; a grade would say little.
Not graded
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Promise 47%Claims 53%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Promise · 24 wordsUqaqtittiji, I am always going to make sure, when it comes to us doing our work as parliamentarians, that we have transparency, of course.Vague promiseClaims · 27 wordsI know, for example, that when I asked my question about protecting the environment, I talked about how important the Inuit-led wind project is in Hope Bay—1Off point