← Back to the statement
Statement grade
The average of Signal, Respect and Clarity. Average 93 / 100
Signal
78 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Respect
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Clarity
100 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 55% Procedure 6% Positioning 10% The question 29%
Structure · 6 steps
Claims · 3
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 16 words the Liberals blew $500 million on the temporary foreign worker program in the last five years.1 Procedure · 7 words Let us see who spent that money. Procedure Claims · 43 words That $500 million was spent while the current Minister of Justice had the file.2 That $500 million was spent while the current Minister of Canadian Identity and Culture was in the role.3 The current immigration minister is on track to spend even more. Positioning · 11 words That is quite the list of captains on the IRCC Titanic. Positioning The question · 31 words Will the Prime Minister admit that he has lost control and finally put someone in charge who will stop issuing new foreign work permits and abolish the temporary foreign worker program?
At a glance
Lost points for Procedure Positioning
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 78
2 of 2 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “Let us see who spent that money.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “That is quite the list of captains on the IRCC Titanic.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · no score
Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.
Respect · 100
0 of 2 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 100
0 of 2 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Claims · 3
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “blew $500 million on the temporary foreign worker program in the last five years” The government spent $500 million on the temporary foreign worker program in the five years before June 2026. search 2 “That $500 million was spent while the current Minister of Justice had the file” The current Minister of Justice held responsibility for the temporary foreign worker program during part of the five-year period in which $500 million was spent on it. search 3 “That $500 million was spent while the current Minister of Canadian Identity and Culture was in the role” The current Minister of Canadian Identity and Culture held responsibility for the temporary foreign worker program during part of the five-year period in which $500 million was spent on it. search
