Analysis · Point of order · beta

Martin Champoux

Bloc Québécois on Points of Order 2026-06-04

47 words · 3 sentences · 4 clauses

Statement grade

–

Not graded

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 51%The ask 28%Reasoning 21%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 24 wordsI am the main focus and target of my colleague’s point of order, but, like you, I did not hear myself say anything unparliamentary. The ask · 13 wordsPerhaps my colleague would be willing to clarify what she was referring to. Reasoning · 10 wordsThen we could see if an apology is in order.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

Nothing lost points on Signal.

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 100

Nothing lost points on Respect.

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Clarity · 100

Nothing lost points on Clarity.

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Claims · 0

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

No checkable claims.

Analysed on 2026-10-20