“Mr. Speaker, there is clearly something important in this bill. However, in committee, the Liberals decided to vote against a Bloc Québécois amendment that would have applied mandatory conditions to any offence against an intimate partner, including purely financial disputes, such as fraud. These included a no-contact order, a ban on cross-examination, house arrest and a ban on possessing firearms. Evidence that a female victim could legally rely on to strengthen her defence is being rejected by the Liberals. Why is that?”
Statement grade
F
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 71. The grade is held to 30, 30 above Relevance.
30 / 100, held down by Relevance
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 67%Procedure 13%Reasoning 20%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 62 wordsI have just become a member of the status of women committee.1I am really thrilled that we are working at a systems level to start to address some of these challenges that we are seeing in the laws and to hearing from some of the folks who are doing the work on the front lines to identify some of these challenges.Off pointProcedure · 12 wordsI cannot speak to the question that the member brought up specifically, ProcedureReasoning · 18 wordsbut I want to say that this work needs to be happening with a much more systematic approach.Off point
