Patricia Lattanzio

Mr. Speaker, Greeting · 29 wordsit is an honour for me to rise this evening on behalf of the citizens of Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel to speak to Bill C-16, the protecting victims act, at third reading.Greeting Procedure · 9 wordsAcross the country, we are facing a stark reality.Procedure Claims · 39 wordsIn my home province of Quebec, there have been 10 femicides since January.¹ A woman is killed in Canada every 48 hours.² Bad actors are taking advantage of rapidly changing technologies such as AI and deepfakes to victimize Canadians. Positioning · 4 wordsThat is completely unacceptable.Positioning Reasoning · 20 wordsAs legislators, we have a responsibility to act, to make real change when Canadians are asking us to do so. Positioning · 12 wordsThis is the job Canadians sent us to the House to do.Positioning Claims · 21 wordsWith Bill C-16, we would put into place concrete measures that would make a real difference in the lives of Canadians.Vague promise Reasoning · 29 wordsBehind every one of these numbers is a person, a family and a community left to grieve. We owe those families more than our sympathy. We owe them action, Procedure · 15 wordsso let me outline a few of the key changes that Bill C-16 would bring.Procedure Claims · 20 wordsFirst, we would create a new Criminal Code offence that captures the coercive and controlling conduct of an intimate partner.³ Reasoning · 68 wordsOne may ask, what is the significance of criminalizing such a behaviour in the face of fatal violence against women? The answer is that coercive control is so often the warning sign of the harm we can see before the harm we cannot undo. By criminalizing coercive control, we would give the criminal justice system an opportunity to intervene before relationships become violent, and before violence becomes deadly. Claims · 163 wordsThis is a measure with the potential to save lives in this country. Coalition féministe contre la violence envers les femmes tells us that this type of violence, which so often goes unseen, is one of the main determinants of femicide.⁴ Criminalizing it would help us detect high-risk situations sooner and strengthen prevention. Next, through Bill C-16, we would automatically recognize femicide as first-degree murder.⁵ This would ensure that anyone who murders a woman in situations involving control, hate, sexual violence or exploitation faces the harshest penalty: life imprisonment. Even in situations of manslaughter, under the circumstances I have raised, courts would be directed to consider imposing a life sentence, with a period of parole ineligibility of between 10 and 25 years, the same penalty that applies to second-degree murder.⁶ Treating these murders as the Criminal Code’s most serious forms of homicide speaks directly to the gravity of these offences and to the seriousness with which the government is moving to address them. Procedure · 24 wordsI would like to dwell for a moment on the term I am using here, “femicide”, and the importance of naming it as such.Procedure Claims · 61 wordsWith Bill C-16, we would be including the term “femicide” in the Criminal Code for the very first time.⁷ By putting a name to this insidious crime, we recognize its gravity and have put forward tangible measures to address it, measures that would lead to better protection of women in particular, as well as of children and other members of society. Procedure · 25 wordsNext I would like to address how the bill would protect children from predators, strengthening Canada’s response to child sexual exploitation both online and off-line.Procedure Claims · 102 wordsMost significantly, Bill C-16 would strengthen mandatory minimum penalties for predators who possess or access child sexual abuse and exploitation material, including restoring more than 12 mandatory minimum penalties for a range of child sexual offences that were previously struck down by the courts.⁸ It would do so by introducing a safety valve to ensure that these sentences, and other existing mandatory minimum penalties that would have otherwise been at risk, remain constitutionally valid. We are also seeking to expand the definition of distributing child sexual exploitation and abuse material so that it would now include the threat of distributing such materials.⁹ Reasoning · 50 wordsChildren rely on the adults around them to keep them safe, to care for them and to protect their well-being. When someone exploits that trust and vulnerability for sexual purposes, it is profoundly wrong. It is conduct that every member of the House and every Canadian should condemn without hesitation. Claims · 98 wordsIn a world of ever-changing technology, where explicit images and videos can be shared in an instant and where Canadians are accessing these platforms at a younger age, we must also hold accountable the people on whose platforms this content exists. Bill C‑16 would bolster mandatory reporting and data preservation obligations for online service providers so law enforcement can find and charge these offenders faster.¹⁰ Finally, Bill C‑16 would truly provide help to victims and give them a louder voice in the system. Some of them are part of cases that include complex trials in the justice system, Reasoning · 9 wordsand with that complexity comes the element of time. Claims · 97 wordsThe time periods outlined in the Jordan decision can be restrictive, turning a measure meant to bring justice into one that can take it away.¹¹ When a stay of proceedings is automatically demanded, victims lose their chance to be heard, and they feel that justice has been denied to them. With Bill C‑16, we would require the courts to consider remedies other than a stay of proceedings should the Jordan period elapse.¹² We would also be clarifying for the courts which more complex cases deserve a longer period of time before they run into such an issue. Reasoning · 9 wordsEvery victim should have the chance to be heard, Promise · 7 wordsand we would make sure of that.Vague promise Claims · 91 wordsWe would also be putting more information into the hands of victims by providing them with information about available resources proactively, without requiring a formal request.¹³ We would be expanding access to testimonial aids for victims of offences committed by an intimate partner and clarifying victims’ rights to present impact statements at the sentencing, parole and correction stages.¹⁴ We would also be enhancing the disclosure of information to victims under the Corrections and Conditional Release Act so victims can have the full scope of the status and location of their offender.¹⁵ Procedure · 28 wordsWhile I have highlighted but a few of the essential measures the protecting victims act would introduce, the issues of gender-based violence and sexual exploitation impact us all.Procedure Reasoning · 37 wordsWhether it be a family member, a friend, a colleague or a neighbour, someone in our lives has needed or will need these remedies one day, and it is important that we step up to provide them. Claims · 20 wordsBill C‑16 has been supported by law enforcement, by victim advocates and by Canadians from coast to coast to coast, The ask · 23 wordsand I implore all members of the House, of all political stripes, to stand with victims and lend their support to Bill C‑16.