MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT

Patricia Lattanzio

Follow by RSS

Lattanzio champions Bill C-16, which would criminalize coercive control, recognize femicide in the Criminal Code and protect children from online sextortion. She also works on interparliamentary diplomacy as chair of the Canadian Section of ParlAmericas. Her arguments lean heavily on tributes: she often opens by noting that “my colleague sits with me at the justice committee” before turning to the case at hand.Written by AI from their statements. Updated .

Average grade
A–
88 / 100 over 8 statements
Signal 84 / 100
Relevance 77 / 100
Respect 100 / 100
Clarity 90 / 100
Averaged over the 8 of 9 statements graded so far.

In their own words

Statements 9

Statements by Members ·

Canada-Mexico Relations

“I welcome the Mexican lawmakers visiting Ottawa today. Canada and Mexico need to keep working together closely on trade and democracy.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, as the chair of the Canadian Section of ParlAmericas, I am delighted to welcome here today in Ottawa a delegation of members of Mexico’s chamber of deputies. ParlAmericas brings legislators from across the Americas and the Caribbean together to strengthen parliamentary dialogue and democratic governance and to build lasting partnerships. Today’s visits builds on the Canadian Section of ParlAmericas delegation’s bilateral visit to Mexico last March, ahead of the joint review of CUSMA, where I had the honour of meeting and engaging with members of parliament from Mexico. That visit provided a timely opportunity to let our Mexican counterparts know the importance of maintaining strong Canada-Mexico co-operation as we look to the future of North American trade and economic integration. Their presence here today is a testament to the strong bonds that exist between Canada and Mexico and to our shared commitment to democracy, dialogue and co-operation. Bienvenida a toda la delegación mexicana en Canadá.

Government Orders ·

Government Orders

In response to a question from Anju Dhillon

“I support this bill. Women's groups have asked for these protections for years. It protects women from abuse and protects children from online extortion.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, my colleague also sits on the justice committee and has contributed to the study of Bill C‑16 and many other important pieces of legislation. This bill, Bill C‑16, has been waiting to be brought forward for many years. Women’s groups have come forward and have told governments and politicians to enact, finally, a piece of legislation that would protect them. It would also protect children who are being abused with sextortion online. We see it, we hear it and we read it in the papers. This is a relief, not only for today, but for many generations to come.

In response to a question from Sébastien Lemire

“This bill protects victims. It gives police and courts better tools to catch predators faster, including making service providers share information.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 100 of 100

    Of this reply, 100% addressed the question or point raised.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, in fact, what this does is basically give tools. The objective of Bill C‑16 is to protect victims. It gives tools to police enforcement and those who work in the justice realm, so that they will be able to catch predators faster. It imposes on service providers to share the information. Bill C‑16 will be a helpful remedy.

In response to a question from Roman Baber

“I want the House to pass this bill. It protects victims and children. It also makes sure sentences for criminals cannot be overturned by courts.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 46 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, my colleague sits with me at the justice committee, and we have done tremendous work on various bills, including Bill C‑16, through hearing testimony from experts, going through clause-by-clause and making amendments, so I want to thank him for his collaboration on the committee. The purpose of this specific bill is to protect victims and children. That is the focus of Bill C‑16. The bill would bring in measures so victims can finally get the protections that they need. We would establish a measure, in terms of the mandatory minimum penalties, in Bill C‑16, the safety valve, so that when an accused receives a sentence or a penalty, the measure would make sure the sentence will not be struck down.

In response to a question from Ellis Ross

“I want the House to pass this bill. It makes controlling a partner a crime. It makes killing a woman in abusive situations count as first-degree murder. It also brings back tougher punishments for child abuse crimes and gives more help to victims.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, it is an honour for me to rise this evening on behalf of the citizens of Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel to speak to Bill C-16, the protecting victims act, at third reading. Across the country, we are facing a stark reality. In my home province of Quebec, there have been 10 femicides since January. A woman is killed in Canada every 48 hours. Bad actors are taking advantage of rapidly changing technologies such as AI and deepfakes to victimize Canadians. That is completely unacceptable. As legislators, we have a responsibility to act, to make real change when Canadians are asking us to do so. This is the job Canadians sent us to the House to do. With Bill C-16, we would put into place concrete measures that would make a real difference in the lives of Canadians. Behind every one of these numbers is a person, a family and a community left to grieve. We owe those families more than our sympathy. We owe them action, so let me outline a few of the key changes that Bill C-16 would bring. First, we would create a new Criminal Code offence that captures the coercive and controlling conduct of an intimate partner. One may ask, what is the significance of criminalizing such a behaviour in the face of fatal violence against women? The answer is that coercive control is so often the warning sign of the harm we can see before the harm we cannot undo. By criminalizing coercive control, we would give the criminal justice system an opportunity to intervene before relationships become violent, and before violence becomes deadly. This is a measure with the potential to save lives in this country. Coalition féministe contre la violence envers les femmes tells us that this type of violence, which so often goes unseen, is one of the main determinants of femicide. Criminalizing it would help us detect high-risk situations sooner and strengthen prevention. Next, through Bill C-16, we would automatically recognize femicide as first-degree murder. This would ensure that anyone who murders a woman in situations involving control, hate, sexual violence or exploitation faces the harshest penalty: life imprisonment. Even in situations of manslaughter, under the circumstances I have raised, courts would be directed to consider imposing a life sentence, with a period of parole ineligibility of between 10 and 25 years, the same penalty that applies to second-degree murder. Treating these murders as the Criminal Code’s most serious forms of homicide speaks directly to the gravity of these offences and to the seriousness with which the government is moving to address them. I would like to dwell for a moment on the term I am using here, “femicide”, and the importance of naming it as such. With Bill C-16, we would be including the term “femicide” in the Criminal Code for the very first time. By putting a name to this insidious crime, we recognize its gravity and have put forward tangible measures to address it, measures that would lead to better protection of women in particular, as well as of children and other members of society. Next I would like to address how the bill would protect children from predators, strengthening Canada’s response to child sexual exploitation both online and off-line. Most significantly, Bill C-16 would strengthen mandatory minimum penalties for predators who possess or access child sexual abuse and exploitation material, including restoring more than 12 mandatory minimum penalties for a range of child sexual offences that were previously struck down by the courts. It would do so by introducing a safety valve to ensure that these sentences, and other existing mandatory minimum penalties that would have otherwise been at risk, remain constitutionally valid. We are also seeking to expand the definition of distributing child sexual exploitation and abuse material so that it would now include the threat of distributing such materials. Children rely on the adults around them to keep them safe, to care for them and to protect their well-being. When someone exploits that trust and vulnerability for sexual purposes, it is profoundly wrong. It is conduct that every member of the House and every Canadian should condemn without hesitation. In a world of ever-changing technology, where explicit images and videos can be shared in an instant and where Canadians are accessing these platforms at a younger age, we must also hold accountable the people on whose platforms this content exists. Bill C‑16 would bolster mandatory reporting and data preservation obligations for online service providers so law enforcement can find and charge these offenders faster. Finally, Bill C‑16 would truly provide help to victims and give them a louder voice in the system. Some of them are part of cases that include complex trials in the justice system, and with that complexity comes the element of time. The time periods outlined in the Jordan decision can be restrictive, turning a measure meant to bring justice into one that can take it away. When a stay of proceedings is automatically demanded, victims lose their chance to be heard, and they feel that justice has been denied to them. With Bill C‑16, we would require the courts to consider remedies other than a stay of proceedings should the Jordan period elapse. We would also be clarifying for the courts which more complex cases deserve a longer period of time before they run into such an issue. Every victim should have the chance to be heard, and we would make sure of that. We would also be putting more information into the hands of victims by providing them with information about available resources proactively, without requiring a formal request. We would be expanding access to testimonial aids for victims of offences committed by an intimate partner and clarifying victims’ rights to present impact statements at the sentencing, parole and correction stages. We would also be enhancing the disclosure of information to victims under the Corrections and Conditional Release Act so victims can have the full scope of the status and location of their offender. While I have highlighted but a few of the essential measures the protecting victims act would introduce, the issues of gender-based violence and sexual exploitation impact us all. Whether it be a family member, a friend, a colleague or a neighbour, someone in our lives has needed or will need these remedies one day, and it is important that we step up to provide them. Bill C‑16 has been supported by law enforcement, by victim advocates and by Canadians from coast to coast to coast, and I implore all members of the House, of all political stripes, to stand with victims and lend their support to Bill C‑16.

Statements by Members ·

Open Parliament Network

“I hosted more than 80 lawmakers from Latin America and the Caribbean in Ottawa last week. Canada is leading the way on trade, technology, and climate action to strengthen democracy across the Americas.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, as chair of the Canadian Section of ParlAmericas, I was proud to welcome last week, here in Ottawa, more than 80 parliamentarians from 25 countries from across Latin America and the Caribbean, alongside indigenous leaders and youth, for the 10th gathering of the Open Parliament Network. ParlAmericas has become the leading interparliamentary organization of the western hemisphere, connecting and engaging national legislatures to strengthen democracy, co-operation and collective action on trade, innovation, security and sustainability. Through Canada’s leadership on AI, security, climate action, food security and democratic governance, Canada is helping set the frameworks others will follow. We also witnessed the signing of an MOU between the United Nations’ development program and ParlAmericas, reaffirming the commitment to collaborative legislative action and strengthening co-operation throughout the Americas and the Caribbean. Muchas gracias to the participating parliamentarians who made the gathering possible, memorable and successful.

Oral Questions ·

Justice

In response to a question from Alana Hirtle

“I want all members to pass this bill quickly to protect victims. It makes controlling or threatening a partner a crime before it turns deadly, and it protects people from sexual exploitation like fake computer-made pictures.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague for her leadership. Violence driven by control and fear leaves deep and lasting harm, and far too many women and children are living with those consequences. That is why we introduced Bill C-16, one of the most significant updates to Canada’s criminal justice system in generations. It would criminalize coercive control before violence turns lethal and would strengthen protections against sexual exploitation, including AI deepfakes. Every day we delay in passing this bill, we are delaying protecting victims. I urge all members to support Bill C-16.

In response to a question from Mario Simard

“Our party will follow the law on voting thresholds. We believe in democracy. We will wait and see what happens in Alberta.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, our party will always follow the laws regarding clarity and the threshold of 50% plus one. We have no intention of going against that law, which is very clear. We believe in democracy. We will wait and see what happens in Alberta.

In response to a question from Mario Simard

“We will always protect the Constitution and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. We will not comment on Alberta until we see the results. The law is clear that a majority means more than half the votes, and that law must be followed.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, our government will always protect the Constitution and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. We will always defend them. We are not going to speak on that at this stage. We will wait for the results to come in and see what happens in Alberta. However, the Prime Minister has been very clear. The rules are clear. A majority is 50% of the votes plus one. There are laws on that and they have to be upheld.