Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Patricia Lattanzio

Liberal on Government Orders 2026-06-04

99 words · 6 sentences · 7 clauses

Replying to Anju Dhillon (Liberal)

“Mr. Speaker, we have been working hard together, at the justice committee, on this issue. It is historic legislation. Things that have never been addressed before are being covered under this legislation. Can our hon. colleague tell us what kind of impact it will have on future generations, as opposed to what has happened in the past?”

Statement grade

Average 76 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Thanks 24%Claims 76%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Thanks · 24 wordsmy colleague also sits on the justice committee and has contributed to the study of Bill C‑16 and many other important pieces of legislation.¹Thanks Claims · 75 wordsThis bill, Bill C‑16, has been waiting to be brought forward for many years. Women’s groups have come forward and have told governments and politicians to enact, finally, a piece of legislation that would protect them. It would also protect children who are being abused with sextortion online. We see it, we hear it and we read it in the papers.Partly on pointUnearned certainty This is a relief, not only for today, but for many generations to come.

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 71

1 of 6 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Thanks and tributes.What the tags mean “my colleague also sits on the justice committee and has contributed to the study of Bill C‑16 and many other important pieces of legislation.”Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · 55

4 of 6 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the bill under debate.

Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “This bill, Bill C‑16, has been waiting to be brought forward for many years.”About the bill’s long wait, not its impact on future generations.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “Women’s groups have come forward and have told governments and politicians to enact, finally, a piece of legislation that would protect them.”About women’s groups’ calls for legislation, not the impact on future generations asked about.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “It would also protect children who are being abused with sextortion online.”About whom the bill protects, not the impact on future generations asked about.
Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about.What the tags mean “We see it, we hear it and we read it in the papers.”About the prevalence of the problem, not the bill’s impact on future generations.

Respect · 100

0 of 6 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 79

1 of 6 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Something stated as certain with nothing to back it.What the tags mean “We see it, we hear it”The formula asserts the problem firsthand in place of any source or evidence.

Claims · 1

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“sits on the justice committee and has contributed to the study of Bill C‑16”Anju Dhillon sits on the justice committee and has contributed to its study of Bill C-16.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20