Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Tim Watchorn

Liberal on Build Canada Homes Act 2026-06-05

80 words · 4 sentences · 4 clauses

Replying to Kevin Lamoureux (Liberal)

“Madam Speaker, I appreciate my colleague’s words on the importance of Build Canada Homes. He highlighted how important it is to recognize that Build Canada Homes is not going to operate in itself, that it is very much going to work collaboratively with different stakeholders and provincial jurisdictions. It is all about doing what the Prime Minister and the government as a whole have been talking about, and that is increasing Canada’s housing supply, with some particular focus on affordable housing. I wonder if he could just provide his thoughts on how important it is that we work collaboratively with the different stakeholders out there.”

Statement grade

A+

Average 100 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 54%Reasoning 46%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Madam Speaker, Claims · 43 wordsI think the best example of that is the deal we signed with Quebec for 865 new homes that are going to be happening rapidly.¹ We were able to coordinate with the provincial government to make sure that its priorities became our priorities. Reasoning · 37 wordsThat is what we need in these times to get stuff built as quickly as possible because we have to get out of this housing crisis. The best way to do it is through Build Canada Homes.

At a glance

Nothing lost points.

Choose a measurement above to see how it scored.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

Nothing lost points on Signal.

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Relevance · 100

Nothing lost points on Relevance.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the bill under debate.

Respect · 100

Nothing lost points on Respect.

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Clarity · 100

Nothing lost points on Clarity.

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Claims · 1

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“the deal we signed with Quebec for 865 new homes”Canada’s federal government signed a deal with Quebec for 865 new homes under the Build Canada Homes initiative.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20