Claims 68% Anecdote 3% Reasoning 12% Positioning 14% Procedure 2% Aside 0%
Structure · 42 steps
Claims · 25
Echo · said 3 times
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Madam Speaker, Claims · 170 words I was an MLA in British Columbia in the years coinciding with when the Conservatives were in power under former prime minister Stephen Harper.1 Those were the years when Canada, and more specifically B.C., was moving forward. Projects were getting built under a free enterprise provincial and federal government. In my riding, there is the Golden Ears Bridge, the Pitt River Bridge, the Port Mann Bridge and the expansion of the Trans-Canada Highway. The highway that used to go between Vancouver and Squamish was called the highway of death because of all the fatalities there. That was expanded. There is Kicking Horse Pass. The Olympics happened.2 There is the Canada Line, the convention centre and a new stadium, new hospitals and new schools. All throughout British Columbia there was tremendous progress, and I know that this was the same throughout the country. The New York Times, during that period, said that Canada had the richest middle class in the world.3 We had a dollar at par with the American dollar.4 Anecdote · 34 words I would talk to Americans and others visiting Canada and visiting Victoria, where I often was for my government work. They were amazed by the prosperity they saw in British Columbia and in Canada. Anecdote Claims · 76 words Let us keep in mind that between 2007 and mid-2009, the world underwent the great global recession. It was the most severe economic and financial meltdown since the Great Depression in the late twenties and the thirties, impacting housing significantly. Canada weathered this storm very well, and we were number one in growth.5 Off point Between 2006 and 2015, under Stephen Harper, there were two million housing starts in Canada, 6 while the population growth was about 3.2 million.7 Reasoning · 17 words Using household sizes, those starts were enough to accommodate more people than the population during that period. Partly on point Claims · 7 words Canada fared the best in the G7.8 Positioning · 10 words We were a prosperous nation going from strength to strength. Positioning Off point Procedure · 3 words Fast-forward to 2026. Procedure Positioning · 26 words After 11 long years under the Liberal government and under two Liberal prime ministers, we have gone from boom to gloom and from first to worst. Positioning Claims · 94 words There has been economic stagnation and decline under the Liberals. In three of the last four quarters, we have shrunk.9 We are in a recession. We are the only country in the G20 with an economy that is shrinking.10 Partly on point The G20 includes nations such as Argentina, which was an economic basket case not so long ago; Australia; Brazil; China; France; Germany; India; Indonesia; Italy; Japan; Mexico, whose number one trading partner is the U.S., 11 as it is for Canada; Russia; Saudi Arabia; South Africa; South Korea; Turkey; the United Kingdom and the United States. Off point Positioning · 17 words I know that the Liberals would like to blame the U.S. for all the problems Canada faces, Positioning Claims · 15 words but all these countries are impacted by U.S. tariffs, and some are in war zones. Partly on point Procedure · 9 words However, credit must be given where credit is deserved. Procedure Positioning · 21 words The Liberals excel, get an A, for building bureaucracy, increasing red tape and doling out money to friends, family and themselves. Positioning Claims · 18 words Since I was elected to the House of Commons in 2019, it has been one scandal after another. Aside · 6 words We get numb after a while. Aside Claims · 46 words The Conservatives had their scandals also. One lady, a cabinet minister, resigned for having a $16 glass of orange juice.12 Off point The Prime Minister promised to double housing construction to half a million homes a year and to move at speeds we have not seen in generations.13 Positioning · 5 words How has that turned out? Positioning Claims · 72 words More than one year in, the result is the exact opposite: Partly on point fewer permits, fewer starts, and a housing crisis that keeps getting worse. For example, Toronto has experienced a major housing construction downturn, a crash. Starts are down more than 50% in the last three years.14 New condo sales in the GTA collapsed to 1,599 units in 2025, the lowest annual total in 35 years and 91% less than the 10-year average.15 Procedure · 7 words However, this must be kept in context. Procedure Claims · 95 words Canada’s population has increased by 2.5 million people in the last three years alone, under the Liberals’ chaotic handling of immigration.16 Construction should be skyrocketing, not plummeting. The Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation says that we need to build 480,000 homes a year for the next decade.17 We are expected to build only half of that this year and only 212,000 units by 2028.18 Meanwhile, 131,000 Canadians who used to work in construction are unemployed as of April, 19 and half of home builders and contractors are reporting layoffs in the first quarter of this year.20 Positioning · 83 words Maybe there is a strategy under this political madness. Maybe the intention is to make things so bad that when there is a change, and I think there was some positive news with the numbers today, the Liberals will blow the trumpets, bang on the drums and say how they have turned things around, how marvellous things have become. However, this is a fail. It is not a new day. It is not a new government. It is the same old, same old. Positioning Partly on point Claims · 61 words Instead of a plan to build homes, the Liberals would deliver a fourth housing bureaucracy. Far from building at generational speeds, they have taken a year to introduce legislation that still builds no homes. Even when homes start getting built, the Parliamentary Budget Officer found, Build Canada Homes would add just 5,000 homes per year, 1% of what the Liberals promised.21 Reasoning · 34 words We can do the math on how much is being invested right there and what that equates to as far as cost per unit. It is more bureaucracy, more red tape and more cost. Claims · 55 words I recently held a round table with builders and developers. They are asking for less government in the homebuilding process, not more. Ever-increasing regulations are killing the market and driving up construction costs. Federal, provincial and municipal regulations and taxes are all adding costs, not just for the builder but also for the home purchaser. Reasoning · 22 words If we are to make housing affordable for Canadians, we need to cut the cost of building and to build more, faster. Claims · 13 words Bill C‑20 would not build, and it would not cut costs for builders. Positioning · 4 words What would it do? Positioning Claims · 7 words It would build a fourth government bureaucracy. Positioning · 6 words That is an F, for “fail”. Positioning Claims · 4 words I was a teacher. Off point Procedure · 8 words We can see the stats here very clearly. Procedure Claims · 42 words Canadians used to be able to buy their first home in their twenties or early thirties. Realtors in Vancouver tell me that it is now an anomaly for new homebuyers to purchase a place without getting significant financial help from their family. Reasoning · 15 words This is building a sharp divide in Canadian society between the haves and the have-nots. Positioning · 4 words This is not good. Positioning Reasoning · 25 words It is becoming dependent upon generational wealth rather than on someone’s being able to make it on their own, even with a supposedly great salary. Claims · 50 words Conservatives have a plan: Cut the GST on all new homes under $1.3 million , saving families up to $65,000 and unleashing new building; 22 tie federal infrastructure dollars to homebuilding, with municipalities having to permit at least 15% more homebuilding each year to get things done; 23 cut development charges by 50%, 24 Reasoning · 13 words because the number one cost of construction is all the regulations and permitting; Claims · 25 words and end the capital gains tax on reinvestments in new housing in Canada and unlock billions of dollars of investment in the country’s homebuilding sector.25 Reasoning · 18 words Canadians should be able to earn a strong paycheque in a thriving economy to buy an affordable home. Claims · 6 words It used to be this way, Reasoning · 7 words and it can be this way again.
At a glance
Lost points for Off point ×48 Partly on point ×21 Positioning ×15 Procedure ×4 Anecdote ×3 Aside
Echo ×3 “Cut the GST on all new homes under $1.3 million.” Said 3 times by 3 members. Every time it was said →
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 75
23 of 92 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Anecdote A story that illustrates instead of making a point. What the tags mean → “I would talk to Americans and others visiting Canada and visiting Victoria,” An anecdote: it illustrates, it does not claim, reason or ask.
Anecdote A story that illustrates instead of making a point. What the tags mean → “where I often was for my government work.” An anecdote: it illustrates, it does not claim, reason or ask.
Anecdote A story that illustrates instead of making a point. What the tags mean → “They were amazed by the prosperity they saw in British Columbia and in Canada.” An anecdote: it illustrates, it does not claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We were a prosperous nation going from strength to strength.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “Fast-forward to 2026.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “After 11 long years under the Liberal government and under two Liberal prime ministers, we have gone from boom to gloom and from first to worst.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “I know that the Liberals would like to blame the U.S. for all the problems Canada faces,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “However, credit must be given where credit is deserved.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “The Liberals excel, get an A, for building bureaucracy, increasing red tape and doling out money to friends, family and themselves.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Aside A remark off to the side of the point. What the tags mean → “We get numb after a while.” An aside: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “How has that turned out?” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “However, this must be kept in context.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Maybe there is a strategy under this political madness.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Maybe the intention is to make things so bad that when there is a change,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “and I think there was some positive news with the numbers today, the Liberals will blow the trumpets, bang on the drums and say how they have turned things around, how marvellous things have become.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “However, this is a fail.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “It is not a new day.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “It is not a new government.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “It is the same old, same old.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “What would it do?” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “That is an F, for “fail”.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “We can see the stats here very clearly.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “This is not good.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 53
69 of 92 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I was an MLA in British Columbia in the years coinciding with when the Conservatives were in power under former prime minister Stephen Harper.” Personal background about the speaker’s time as an MLA, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Those were the years when Canada,” General praise of Canada under a past government, not the bill or housing.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and more specifically B.C., was moving forward.” Praise of B.C.’s past progress, not the bill or housing.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Projects were getting built under a free enterprise provincial and federal government.” Past governments building projects, not the bill’s housing measures.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “In my riding, there is the Golden Ears Bridge, the Pitt River Bridge, the Port Mann Bridge and the expansion of the Trans-Canada Highway.” Local infrastructure projects in the speaker’s riding, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The highway that used to go between Vancouver and Squamish was called the highway of death because of all the fatalities there.” History of a highway’s nickname, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “That was expanded.” A highway expansion, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “There is Kicking Horse Pass.” A mountain pass project, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The Olympics happened.” The Olympics, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “There is the Canada Line, the convention centre and a new stadium, new hospitals and new schools.” Past infrastructure and public buildings, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “All throughout British Columbia there was tremendous progress,” General praise of past progress in B.C., not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and I know that this was the same throughout the country.” General praise of past national progress, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The New York Times, during that period, said that Canada had the richest middle class in the world.” A past citation about the middle class, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We had a dollar at par with the American dollar.” Past exchange rate, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I would talk to Americans and others visiting Canada and visiting Victoria,” Anecdote about visitors, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “where I often was for my government work.” Where the speaker worked, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “They were amazed by the prosperity they saw in British Columbia and in Canada.” Anecdote about visitors’ impressions, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Let us keep in mind that between 2007 and mid-2009, the world underwent the great global recession.” Past global recession history, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It was the most severe economic and financial meltdown since the Great Depression in the late twenties and the thirties, impacting housing significantly.” Description of the past recession, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Canada weathered this storm very well,” Past economic performance, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and we were number one in growth.” Past growth ranking, not the bill.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Between 2006 and 2015, under Stephen Harper, there were two million housing starts in Canada,” Past government’s housing starts, offered as a contrast, not the bill’s provisions.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “while the population growth was about 3.2 million.” Past population growth figures, not the bill’s provisions.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Using household sizes, those starts were enough to accommodate more people than the population during that period.” Past housing adequacy arithmetic, not the bill’s provisions.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Canada fared the best in the G7.” Past economic ranking, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We were a prosperous nation going from strength to strength.” General past prosperity, not the bill.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “After 11 long years under the Liberal government and under two Liberal prime ministers, we have gone from boom to gloom and from first to worst.” A general attack on the government’s years in office, not the bill’s provisions.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “There has been economic stagnation and decline under the Liberals.” General economic claims about the government, not the bill’s provisions.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “In three of the last four quarters, we have shrunk.” GDP figures on the economy, not the bill’s provisions.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “We are in a recession.” A general recession claim, not the bill’s provisions.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “We are the only country in the G20 with an economy that is shrinking.” A comparative economic claim, not the bill’s provisions.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The G20 includes nations such as Argentina,” A list of G20 countries offered to support the economic comparison, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “which was an economic basket case not so long ago;” A comment on Argentina, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Australia;” A listed country, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Brazil;” A listed country, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “China;” A listed country, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “France;” A listed country, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Germany;” A listed country, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “India;” A listed country, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Indonesia;” A listed country, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Italy;” A listed country, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Japan;” A listed country, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Mexico, whose number one trading partner is the U.S.,” A comment on Mexico’s trade, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “as it is for Canada;” A note on trade partners, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Russia;” A listed country, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Saudi Arabia;” A listed country, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “South Africa;” A listed country, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “South Korea;” A listed country, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Turkey;” A listed country, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “the United Kingdom and the United States.” A listed country, not the bill.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “I know that the Liberals would like to blame the U.S. for all the problems Canada faces,” Claims about how the Liberals assign blame for the economy, not the bill’s provisions.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “but all these countries are impacted by U.S. tariffs,” Tariff impacts on other economies, not the bill’s provisions.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “and some are in war zones.” A note on war zones affecting other economies, not the bill’s provisions.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The Liberals excel, get an A, for building bureaucracy, increasing red tape and doling out money to friends, family and themselves.” Blame of the Liberals on bureaucracy and favouritism, not the bill’s subject.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Since I was elected to the House of Commons in 2019, it has been one scandal after another.” General claims about scandals since 2019, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We get numb after a while.” A remark about becoming numb to scandals, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The Conservatives had their scandals also.” A concession about Conservative scandals, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “One lady, a cabinet minister, resigned for having a $16 glass of orange juice.” An anecdote about a past minister’s resignation, not the bill.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “The Prime Minister promised to double housing construction to half a million homes a year and to move at speeds we have not seen in generations.” The government’s housing promise, raised as a contrast rather than the bill’s provisions.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “How has that turned out?” A rhetorical question about the housing promise’s outcome, not the bill’s provisions.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “More than one year in, the result is the exact opposite:” The claimed outcome of the housing promise, not the bill’s provisions.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Maybe there is a strategy under this political madness.” Speculation about the government’s motives, not the bill’s provisions.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “Maybe the intention is to make things so bad that when there is a change,” Speculation about political intent, not the bill’s provisions.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “and I think there was some positive news with the numbers today, the Liberals will blow the trumpets, bang on the drums and say how they have turned things around, how marvellous things have become.” Political commentary on how the Liberals will tout numbers, not the bill’s provisions.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “However, this is a fail.” A general verdict on the government, not the bill’s provisions.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “It is not a new day.” A comment on the government not being new, not the bill’s provisions.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “It is not a new government.” Same point about the government, not the bill’s provisions.
Partly on point Staying near the subject without addressing the matter at hand: what was asked, or what the bill, motion or speech is about. What the tags mean → “It is the same old, same old.” A general comment on the government, not the bill’s provisions.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I was a teacher.” The speaker’s past occupation, not the bill.
Respect · 100
0 of 92 deductions are Respect
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Nothing lost points.
Clarity · 100
0 of 92 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Nothing lost points.
Echo · 1 repeated line
Words members of Parliament keep repeating, found by the same rule for every member. No score depends on it.
“Cut the GST on all new homes under $1.3 million.” Said 3 times by 3 members. Every time it was said →
Claims · 25
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “I was an MLA in British Columbia” Marc Dalton was an MLA in British Columbia during the years the Conservatives under Stephen Harper were in government federally. search
2 “The Olympics happened.” The Winter Olympics were held in British Columbia while the Conservatives were in power under Stephen Harper (Vancouver 2010). search
3 “The New York Times, during that period, said that Canada had the richest middle class in the world.” The New York Times said during the Harper years that Canada had the richest middle class in the world. search
4 “We had a dollar at par with the American dollar.” The Canadian dollar was at par with the American dollar during the Harper years. search
5 “we were number one in growth” Canada ranked number one in economic growth among comparable countries after the 2007-2009 recession. search
6 “Between 2006 and 2015, under Stephen Harper, there were two million housing starts in Canada,” Canada had two million housing starts between 2006 and 2015. search
7 “while the population growth was about 3.2 million.” Canada’s population grew by about 3.2 million between 2006 and 2015. search
8 “Canada fared the best in the G7.” Canada fared the best in the G7 during the Harper years (2006-2015). search
9 “In three of the last four quarters, we have shrunk.” Canada’s economy shrank in three of the last four quarters as of June 2026. search
10 “We are the only country in the G20 with an economy that is shrinking.” Canada is the only country in the G20 with a shrinking economy as of 2026. search
11 “Mexico, whose number one trading partner is the U.S.,” Mexico’s number one trading partner is the United States. search
12 “a cabinet minister, resigned for having a $16 glass of orange juice.” A federal Conservative cabinet minister resigned over an expense claim for a $16 glass of orange juice. search
13 “promised to double housing construction to half a million homes a year” The Prime Minister promised to double housing construction to half a million homes a year. search
14 “Starts are down more than 50% in the last three years.” Housing starts in Toronto are down more than 50% over the last three years. search
15 “1,599 units in 2025, the lowest annual total in 35 years and 91% less than the 10-year average” New condo sales in the Greater Toronto Area were 1,599 units in 2025, the lowest annual total in 35 years and 91% below the 10-year average. search
16 “Canada’s population has increased by 2.5 million people in the last three years” Canada’s population increased by 2.5 million people in the three years before June 2026. search
17 “The Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation says that we need to build 480,000 homes a year for the next decade.” The Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation says Canada needs to build 480,000 homes a year for the next decade. search
18 “only 212,000 units by 2028” Canada is expected to build only 212,000 units by 2028, about half the CMHC target of 480,000 homes a year. search
19 “131,000 Canadians who used to work in construction are unemployed as of April,” 131,000 Canadians who used to work in construction were unemployed as of April 2026. search
20 “half of home builders and contractors are reporting layoffs in the first quarter of this year.” Half of home builders and contractors reported layoffs in the first quarter of 2026. search
21 “the Parliamentary Budget Officer found, Build Canada Homes would add just 5,000 homes per year, 1% of what the Liberals promised.” The Parliamentary Budget Officer found that Build Canada Homes would add 5,000 homes per year, 1% of the Liberals’ promised half a million homes a year. search
22 “Cut the GST on all new homes under $1.3 million, saving families up to $65,000” The Conservative plan includes cutting the GST on all new homes under $1.3 million, saving families up to $65,000. search
23 “tie federal infrastructure dollars to homebuilding, with municipalities having to permit at least 15% more homebuilding each year” The Conservative plan would tie federal infrastructure dollars to municipalities permitting at least 15% more homebuilding each year. search
24 “cut development charges by 50%,” The Conservative plan includes cutting development charges by 50%. search
25 “end the capital gains tax on reinvestments in new housing in Canada” The Conservative plan would end the capital gains tax on reinvestments in new housing in Canada. search