Tony Baldinelli

Mr. Speaker, Greeting · 34 wordsit is an honour to rise in the chamber today to share some final thoughts on my private member’s bill, Bill C-232, before we conclude second reading debate and proceed to an eventual vote.Greeting Claims · 44 wordsWhen I first introduced this bill in the 44th Parliament as Bill C-342, I made a promise to my constituents to see what I could do to help correct a bad policy decision made by the Liberal government in 2019, when it passed C-83.¹²Vague promise Promise · 19 wordsReintroducing this bill in this Parliament is evidence of my continued commitment to fulfill that promise to my constituents. Claims · 42 wordsIf passed, Bill C-232 would require inmates who have been found to be dangerous offenders or convicted of more than one first-degree murder to be assigned a security classification of “maximum” and confined in a maximum-security penitentiary or area in a penitentiary.³ Positioning · 21 wordsThis legislation should be seen as non-partisan and a common-sense legislative response to the concerns expressed by many of our constituents.Positioning Claims · 125 wordsThis is about doing what is right by ensuring that criminal monsters, such as Paul Bernardo, Mark Smich, Dellen Millard and Luka Magnotta, are returned to serve their sentences in a maximum-security penitentiary where they rightly belong. Earlier in this debate, my Bloc colleague expressed concerns that the bill targets only a single case. It does not, as I demonstrated by the list of notorious criminal names I have just read into this record. My Bloc colleague also expressed concerns about CSC’s judgment and that sometimes the justice system makes mistakes.⁴ I agree with this. In fact, that is the very reason why this bill is being debated today. It was a mistake by the CSC to transfer Paul Bernardo from maximum to medium security. The ask · 5 wordsThat needs to be corrected. Positioning · 47 wordsDowngrading the security classification of these criminal monsters is not justice. It is an injustice to victims and their loved ones. The victims in these cases had their lives stolen, and their surviving loved ones have no choice but to endure a lifetime of pain and hurt.Positioning Procedure · 28 wordsI also wish to take a moment to address some of the things we heard and did not hear from the Liberal members taking part in this debate.Procedure Claims · 15 wordsEarlier in this debate, my Liberal colleagues spent a lot of time talking about rehabilitation.⁵ The question · 18 wordsI would like the Liberals to clarify if they think criminal monsters like Paul Bernardo can be rehabilitated. Claims · 36 wordsLet us not forget that former CSC commissioner Anne Kelly, when she appeared before the public safety committee, called Paul Bernardo a “psychopath”.⁶ This bill clearly targets the worst of the worst dangerous offenders in Canada. The question · 14 wordsDo the Liberals truly believe Paul Bernardo should be or deserves to be rehabilitated? Positioning · 23 wordsSadly, too often in this splendid place we hear why things cannot be done and why we cannot make this type of change.Positioning The ask · 16 wordsInstead, let us muster our political will, courage and leadership to bring about this important change. Claims · 151 wordsMy constituent, Marcia Penner, a victims’ rights advocate and friend of Kristen French, supports this change. She said, “As someone whose life has been forever impacted by violent crime, I know firsthand that victims and their families carry the consequences of these horrific acts every day.⁷ Canadians expect the most dangerous offenders to remain in maximum-security institutions, and Bill C-232 helps restore that common-sense principle while respecting the voices of victims.” Alicia Googoo, the founder of the victims’ rights organization Our Heart on Our Sleeve, had this to say about Bill C-232. She said, “As a survivor, I understand the lasting fear and trauma that violent offenders can leave behind.⁸ I know the dangers that can exist when society fails to take the risks posed by the most dangerous offenders seriously. Bill C-232 sends a clear message that public safety matters and that the protection of Canadians must remain a priority.” The ask · 36 wordsI sincerely hope my colleagues across party lines will strongly consider, and reconsider, their positions and vote in favour of Bill C-232 so that this important legislative move can be brought forward for study at committee.