“Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank my colleague for her speech. She is a tireless champion in the fight against gender-based violence. We have had several opportunities to discuss this issue. Her speech conveyed her sincerity and how hard she works on this issue. We now have the opportunity to pass a bill that will enable us to make progress. I would like to know what steps my colleague envisions taking next.”
Statement grade
B+
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 88. The grade is held to 81, 30 above Clarity.
81 / 100, held down by Clarity
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 71%Promise 29%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 82 wordsas I said, the Bloc Québécois proposed amendments to try to avoid some of the inconsistencies we see in Bill C-16.1As I said in reference to section 810 of the Criminal Code, we want the criteria to be more objective than subjective.That was one of the amendments that had been proposed by my colleague to address this situation.2That is the kind of amendment we would have liked to include in the bill, but unfortunately, the Liberals voted against it.3Promise · 24 wordsSo, we will definitely have to bring it up again.Vague promiseThe issue of section 810 of the Criminal Code will need to be addressed, Vague promiseClaims · 18 wordsbecause it is clear that this section is not doing its job of ensuring that victims are safe.Unearned certaintyPromise · 17 wordsThe Bloc Québécois will continue to closely monitor the issue of section 810 of the Criminal Code.Vague promise
