Analysis · Speech on a bill · beta

Arielle Kayabaga

1186 words · 49 sentences · 61 clauses

Statement grade
A+
Average 97 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 4%Greeting 2%Claims 82%Reasoning 10%Positioning 2%The ask 1%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 16 wordsI am pleased to have obtained the unanimous consent of the House to share my time.1Procedure Greeting · 22 wordsI am pleased to rise in the House of Commons today to speak to Bill C‑25, the strong and free elections act.Greeting Claims · 20 wordsBill C‑25 makes changes to the Canada Elections Act that will improve the strength and resilience of Canada’s electoral system. Reasoning · 26 wordsAs we all know, one of the pillars of our democracy is our electoral system, Unearned certaintyand the Canada Elections Act is the foundation of that system. Claims · 90 wordsThe act is already recognized around the world for its rigorous administrative procedures, robust political financing regime and strict spending limits. However, we know that no democracy, including ours, is immune to the growing threats to elections that aim to undermine trust in our democratic electoral processes. Bad actors may try to interfere with our democratic processes and our elections from anywhere in the world at any time. Despite these challenges, the Public Inquiry into Foreign Interference in Federal Electoral Processes and Democratic Institutions confirmed that our elections are safe.2 Reasoning · 31 wordsHowever, we must continue to ensure that Canada’s democracy remains one of the strongest in the world and that it continues to be protected from persistent threats, regardless of the circumstances. Claims · 26 wordsThat is why, in keeping with this long-standing tradition of continually improving the Canada Elections Act, our government is proposing priority amendments to address these threats. Reasoning · 21 wordsIt is essential that we draw on the knowledge and experience of experts when proposing changes to our democratic electoral system. Claims · 53 wordsThrough Bill C-25, our government is acting on the recommendations that were made during the public inquiry into foreign interference, 3as well as those that were made by the Chief Electoral Officer and the commissioner of Canada elections.4 Bill C-25 proposes to further strengthen and secure Canada’s federal elections through several new measures. Procedure · 8 wordsAllow me to elaborate a bit on those.Procedure Claims · 315 wordsAs I mentioned at the outset, interference in elections can occur at any point, and it is not just in elections. Bill C-25 addresses this issue in several ways. First, it would expand the prohibitions regarding undue foreign influence, offering or accepting a bribe, misleading publications that claim to come from someone that they are not, and broadcasting outside Canada with the intent to unduly influence voters to apply at any time, not just during the election period.5 This protection would also be applied to nomination and leadership contests.6 In addition, Bill C-25 extends the extraterritorial application of certain offences to ensure that bad actors operating outside Canada can also be investigated and held accountable for their illegal acts. Bill C‑25 also proposes important new financing rules to increase transparency and prevent anonymous, foreign and covert money from entering our democratic system. This includes prohibiting the use of contributions in the form of cryptoassets and prepaid money orders for all activities conducted by political actors or for regulated activities conducted by third parties.7 It is important to note that under Bill C‑25, third parties will only be permitted to use contributions they have received from Canadian citizens and permanent residents to pay for regulated election expenses.8 However, we understand, as we have heard at the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs, that not all third parties receive contributions and that some may wish to use their own revenues to cover regulated expenses. In this case, third parties whose contributions represent 10% or less of their annual funds will be able to use their own funds to finance regulated activities.9 These amendments will strengthen transparency regarding the source of funds and will mitigate the risk of foreign and covert funds interfering in our elections, without depriving third parties acting in good faith of the ability to exercise their right to participate in the democratic process. Procedure · 18 wordsThe next point I want to highlight this evening is how Bill C-25 tackles the problem of disinformation.Procedure Claims · 206 wordsDisinformation is a key tactic aimed at stoking division and eroding public trust in all of our democratic processes. Disinformation always seeks to manipulate voters through false information that is deliberately disseminated, often online. The amendments proposed in Bill C-25 would strengthen our democratic institutions through new and expanded prohibitions designed to counter this threat. More specifically, the bill would prohibit the deliberate dissemination of false information regarding an election or the electoral process with the intent to interfere with the conduct or results of an election, 10while respecting the principles of freedom of expression and open dialogue that are at the heart of our democracy. Another source of misinformation is the potential misuse of technology, which Bill C-25 would also be addressing. As we all know, technology has helped revolutionize democracies around the world, Unearned certaintybut it also carries several risks. For example, content generated by artificial intelligence has become increasingly difficult to distinguish from reality. When combined with disinformation, AI such as deepfakes can pose significant threats. To address this emerging issue, Bill C-25 would amend the prohibition on impersonation to cover video and audio manipulation, such as deepfakes, 11and extend its application to nomination and leadership candidates, who are also vulnerable to such threats. Reasoning · 42 wordsWhen Canadians go to the polls, they expect to see a ballot that lists the candidates who have a legitimate desire to stand for election and to represent their constituents if elected. That is a fundamental principle of our system of government. Claims · 113 wordsHowever, this is not the case in ridings targeted by those seeking to create excessively long ballots. Instead, Canadians are inundated with the names of people who have neither the desire nor the intention to ever represent the voters’ interests. Not only do these long ballots pose significant accessibility issues for voters and election officials, particularly those with disabilities, but they can also delay vote counting. That is what we heard during the study on unduly long ballots conducted by the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs.12 I am therefore pleased to note that what has been proposed in Bill C-25 is fully in line with all of the committee’s legislative recommendations.13 Positioning · 19 wordsI would add that this is one of the most robust and collaborative processes I have seen to date.Positioning Claims · 144 wordsAt a time when security is a growing concern within our political system, Bill C-25 proposes new safeguards. For example, the home addresses of returning officers will no longer be made public; 14candidates will receive higher reimbursements for their personal security expenses; 15and the rules governing regulated fundraising activities will be amended. The last part of the bill I would like to highlight concerns the important mandate of the independent commissioner of Canada elections, who is responsible for ensuring the implementation and enforcement of the Canada Elections Act. Bill C-25 will strengthen the tools available to the commissioner to fulfill this mandate.16 In closing, Bill C-25, the strong and free elections act, would further strengthen and secure Canada’s federal elections through targeted, priority amendments that were recommended by experts and would ensure that our legislative framework remains resilient in a consistently evolving threat environment. The ask · 16 wordsI urge my colleagues and all members of the House to support this really important bill.

Analysed on