MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT

Arielle Kayabaga

Follow by RSS

Kayabaga supports cultural protections for francophone communities and calls for the rapid delivery of federal projects to Canadian businesses. In parliamentary debate, she often begins her remarks with social courtesies and acknowledgments, for example, stating, “I greatly appreciate my colleague’s questions.”Written by AI from their statements. Updated .

Average grade
B
76 / 100 over 21 statements
Signal 64 / 100
Relevance 78 / 100
Respect 100 / 100
Clarity 86 / 100
Averaged over the 21 of 35 statements graded so far.

In their own words

Statements 35

Government Orders ·

Business of Supply

In response to a question from Marilyn Gladu

“Our government supports CBC/Radio-Canada, festivals, and Canadian artists in this year's budget. The next budget will do even more to protect Canadian culture, especially French-language content.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 47 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I am very grateful to my colleague for her question. Obviously, as has already been mentioned in the House, our government continues to support CBC/Radio-Canada, for example, as well as festivals across Canada and content produced by Canadian artists. We are protecting our artists in budget 2025. I am sure that in the upcoming budget 2026, there will even be more announcements that will continue to protect our Canadian cultural content, especially content made by francophones.

In response to a question from Gérard Deltell

“We want to help Canadian artists and local productions without passing extra costs on to Canadians. During this crisis, we are working to protect people from paying unnecessary fees.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 44 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
  • Reply to a debate question

    Clarity 20 of 100

    Much of this statement used imprecise wording, lacked details on timing or responsibility, or made broad claims without support.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I greatly appreciate my colleague’s questions. I do not think that the question he is asking has a set answer. What we have been saying for a while is that we are working to ensure that we do not add any costs that would be passed on to Canadians. The goal is to help our artists and to keep and protect productions in Canada. The goal is not to make Canadians’ lives more complicated, but really to ensure that no costs are passed on to them. I think that my colleague would also agree that, during a crisis that we did not ask for and that we are currently experiencing across Canada, we must protect Canadians. We want to make sure that Canadians do not continue to pay unnecessary fees. That is what our government is doing.

In response to a question from Mario Beaulieu

“Talking about French speakers in London is not off topic. I can keep my French language and culture because our government supports francophones inside and outside Quebec. The experiences of people in London matter in this House.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 0 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, although I have the utmost respect for my colleague, I still find it sad to hear him say that discussing London’s francophones is off topic when it comes to culture. The reason I am able to keep my language, preserve my francophone identity and live fully in French with my family today is because our government continues to support francophone culture both within and outside Quebec. It saddens me a little to hear my colleague say that the messages or experiences of the people of London, Ontario, are irrelevant in the House.

“I disagree with this motion. Culture is central to communities all across Canada, not just Quebec. Our government is supporting artists, musicians, and local media across the country, including francophones outside Quebec. The arts bring in billions of dollars and support thousands of jobs, and our funding helps keep those jobs and cultures alive.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I will be sharing my time with the member for LaSalle—Émard—Verdun. I want to start by discussing one of the statements in today’s opposition motion. It says that “culture is central to Quebec’s identity”. However, culture is also central to the identity of communities across Canada. I think every community is shaped by its culture. Culture is what enlivens communities and brings them to life. This reality affects not only Quebec, but also Canada and all the communities that make it up. I am very pleased to have the opportunity today to talk about this motion and inform not only Quebeckers, but also all Canadians of the commitments we have made to support creators and cultural workers, as well as the communities that benefit every day from their work. Think of the filmmaker telling the history of their region, the musician recording their first songs, or the journalist giving a voice to the people in their community. To complete their project, they need resources, partners and a long-term vision. Through their work, we learn about experiences that are different from our own. We are introduced to places, voices and stories that are hard to find elsewhere but that contribute to the vitality of our communities. However, we know that the conditions under which this work is accomplished are often difficult and that audience habits are changing. Revenue streams are shifting and funding is becoming more uncertain. Artists, production teams, businesses and local media are all affected by this pressure. Communities are also affected when a project cannot be carried out or when a story is at risk of not being told. When a news team scales back its activities, a region may lose some of its local coverage. As a government, we take these challenges very seriously. Culture is part of what brings us together here in Canada. A song can remind us of our childhood or stay with us for many years. A TV series can give us a glimpse into the life of another community that we are not familiar with. I would like to take this opportunity to return to the topic of Ishaka, the dance troupe I mentioned this week during members’ statements. I noted that it is a group of Burundian Canadians. Some of its members were born here in Canada, while others have brought Burundi’s rich culture to this country. Today, thanks to the cultivation and transmission of songs, poems, and the entire cultural heritage preserved by our elders, we see the youngest members of the Burundian community learning about this culture. They can now speak Kirundi and French, because in Burundi, the primary languages are Kirundi and French. They are learning songs that their grandparents sang many years ago. Last week, I had the opportunity to go on stage and dance with them. Even though I had never danced a Burundian dance in my life, I was lucky enough to share that moment with the members of Ishaka. I was able to reconnect with the culture passed down to me by my ancestors and parents and bring it back to life right here, in my own country, in the city of Ottawa. Above all, I was able to perform on the same stage at the National Arts Centre in Ottawa that superstars like Céline Dion have graced. It was a moment that moved me deeply. What touched me most was seeing young children, little girls and boys aged four of five, embracing this culture. The production brought together nearly 300 people and featured 54 songs on stage, all inspired by Burundian Canadian culture. The goal was not only to pass on Burundian culture but also to adapt it to modern times, within the context of our lives today, here in Ottawa. As I was saying, our government understands the importance of culture, the importance of language, the importance of songs, the importance of sharing poems and information, whether in French, English or any other language. Earlier, my colleague mentioned Punjabi, a language he uses and hears in his community. He also talked about the Filipino community in his riding. All of these cultural expressions need to be passed on through the networks and resources we have. That is why, as a government, we take the importance of funding and supporting our communities very seriously, so that they can continue to tell these stories, sing these songs and disseminate information in the languages spoken in communities across Canada and Quebec. These experiences create shared cultural references, bring generations closer together and strengthen a sense of belonging, as I just mentioned. We want creators from across Canada to be able to nurture these connections and we want new voices to be heard. This also means safeguarding the jobs and skills that make their work possible. In 2024, the audiovisual and interactive media sector contributed more than $20 billion to Canada’s GDP and accounted for more than 172,000 jobs. Sound recording and music publishing contributed more than $542 million to GDP and accounted for about 5,500 jobs. Behind these numbers are actors, technicians, editors and directors. There are also the businesses and suppliers that help sustain the economies of the regions where these productions are made. We want these people to be able to build careers here and pass on their knowledge to the next generation. Widespread appreciation for our musical talent, for example, shows what we can achieve. The accolades received by Charlotte Cardin, Louis-Jean Cormier and Talk are an excellent example. When it comes to supporting our musical artists, the Canada Music Fund is the main financial support program for commercially driven Canadian music. It aims to connect a wide range of Canadian artists with audiences around the world. The program provides financial support to Canadian artists and to music companies and music organizations owned and controlled by Canadians for a variety of activities that enhance the visibility of Canadian artists at home and abroad. In the last budget, we committed $48 million over three years to the Canada Music Fund, starting in 2026-27, to advance our artists’ careers while strengthening the music sector’s competitiveness and stability. The fund’s entire budget is redistributed by non-profit organizations like the Foundation Assisting Canadian Talent on Recordings, in the anglophone market, and Musicaction, in the francophone market. The music industry generates economic activity through performances and drives other important economic sectors, including tourism, entertainment and advertising. It is also crucial to support Canada’s francophone music sector. The sector is confronting major challenges, and its listenership has dropped significantly. Supporting our francophone artists is essential. I would add that it is thanks to the determination of London’s francophone community that there are now 11 French-language elementary schools in London, Ontario. This community has long fought to keep this culture alive. I have a child who attends a French-language school, who can live their life in French, who can work in French, and who listens to music by French-Canadian artists. That is only possible because we have invested in preserving our culture, which is important. When I left Montreal to move to London, there were only four or five francophone elementary schools. Today, there are 11. Not only have we been able to continue living in French and preserve the francophone culture, but we have also seen that culture grow; the francophone community in London continues to grow. There are several reasons for this, of course, but it is partly because we work hard to live in French, continue speaking French and listen to music in French. I could speak at length about the importance of preserving francophone culture both outside and within Quebec. Unfortunately, I do not have enough time. With that, I am ready to take questions from my colleagues.

Oral Questions ·

Business of the House

In response to a question from Andrew Scheer

“I share my condolences with the soldiers and military families affected by the fire in Wainwright. I am glad Alberta voted to stay part of a strong Canada. The opposition can ask their budget questions on the Friday after it is presented. Here is what the House will work on over the next week.”
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Relevance 0 of 100

    None of this answer addressed the specific question that was asked.

    See full analysis
  • Government answer in Question Period

    Signal 0 of 100

    Much of this statement went to praise, blame, greetings, routine procedure or general stories rather than reasons, requests or specific points.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I would like to take this opportunity to offer my condolences to the Canadian Armed Forces members in Wainwright who are dealing with loss, Canadian military families across Canada and the families of the injured who are still dealing with the aftermath of the fire. My prayers and thoughts are with them, and I know the people of London West are also thinking about the people in Alberta. I also want to recognize that on Monday, Albertans voted to stay in Canada. They voted to believe in building a strong country. They voted for building our nation together with Canadian workers, with Canadian material, and that together we will continue to build a strong country. I want to recognize that. The member opposite mentioned our budget that is going to be tabled on November 5, which is a Thursday. I would like to remind the member that after the many years he has sat here, he is well aware that we also sit on Friday. I welcome him coming in on Friday, November 6, to ask a lot of questions. Many members will be in the House to answer those questions. Tomorrow, we will begin to study two bills. In the morning, we will study Bill C-28, the Canadian space launch act. In the afternoon, we will study Bill S-3, on weights and measures. On Monday, we will resume consideration at second reading of Bill C-40, strengthening Canada’s defence sector act. Tuesday, October 27, shall be an allotted day. On Wednesday and Thursday of next week, we will call Bill C-34, the digital safety act, at second reading. Finally, I would like to inform the House that, pursuant to Standing Order 66(2), we will resume debate on Motion No. 10 to concur in the 10th report of the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities, on Tuesday, October 27.

Statements by Members ·

Ishaka Cultural Group

“I want to congratulate the Ishaka Cultural Group for their tenth show, which was performed at the National Arts Centre. I thank the leaders, artists, and volunteers for sharing Burundian culture, history, and traditions with young people and across Canada.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to recognize the 10th production of Ishaka’s show, which marked an historic moment as it performed on stage at the National Arts Centre, here in Ottawa. I would like to congratulate Martine and Marline Sabushimike for their vision and commitment to passing on the richness of our culture, our traditions and, above all, our history to younger generations. I would like to thank the artists, families, volunteers and the entire production team for this magnificent celebration of our cultural heritage, that of Burundian Canadians. When we know where we come from, we have a clearer sense of where we are going, and each one reminds us that our culture is a precious legacy that we must pass on with great pride. I extend my heartfelt congratulations to them on these 10 wonderful productions, and I hope they continue to promote the culture of Burundian Canadians across Canada.

Government Orders ·

Building Canada Strong Act

In response to a question from Alexis Deschênes

“The member says this bill will get projects built faster. I want him to explain how this bill will actually help workers and people in his community and across Canada.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, in his speech, my colleague spoke at length about the fact that the aim of the bill was to move projects along more quickly. I note that he, too, shares this desire; no doubt the people he represents are asking for this as well. Can my colleague tell us in concrete terms how his community, the workers in his community and those across Canada will be impacted by the bill?

“This bill sets a one-year deadline to review projects so money reaches communities and businesses faster. It is easy to say we need less government, but what is the member's actual plan to move these projects forward?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I heard my hon. colleague talk about this. I think it is easy to say government needs to get out of the way, or we need less government, without really putting into words what that actually means to real people. The bill is a proposal to put in a one-year review timeline. What would the member propose to make things move forward so these investments can actually make it to the communities and the businesses who need them, other than just slogans or getting government out of the way?

In response to a question from Ellis Ross

“Can the member explain how the plan to finish project reviews in one year will help communities and businesses waiting for new investment?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, my colleague talked about the importance of building projects faster. Maybe he could expand a bit on the one-year review timeline that the government intends to implement in Bill C-39. What would that mean for the communities and businesses that are waiting for the implementation and would be able to have these investments in their communities?

Government Orders ·

Privilege

“The government did not break any rules. We offered briefings to all parties on this bill after introducing it. Past Speakers have ruled that the government can announce policy updates outside the House, as long as it does not stop members from doing their jobs. Nobody was stopped from doing their job here.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, I rise to speak in response to the question of privilege raised on October 5 by the member for Saint-Jean concerning briefings for members on Bill C-39, the building Canada strong act. As members will recall, this bill was introduced on September 21 during Routine Proceedings. I can confirm that technical briefings on the bill were offered to all parties after the bill was introduced. Having read the member’s remarks carefully, I suspect that her main concern is not the technical briefing on Bill C-39, but rather the government’s update on the west coast pipeline on October 1. If that is the member’s issue, I can assure members that there are still clear precedents supporting the view that the government may announce policies and provide updates on non-legislative matters outside the House. The precedent the member cited in her remarks has no bearing on the issue that was raised. This briefing did not concern a legislative measure that was to be presented to the House during the notice period. Rather, this was an update on a policy matter. That distinction is very important. Our government is committed to working constructively with all parties in the House. The Prime Minister has stated that the government will work with other parties to advance our strategic and legislative agenda. In fact, we have offered technical briefings to all members of Parliament on legislative proposals once they have been introduced in the House. We are doing this not only because it is the right thing to do, but also to help inform and elevate the substantive debate on legislative proposals before the House. I now want to turn to the precedents that support this view. On April 11, 1997, Speaker Parent delivered his ruling on a matter concerning a technical briefing, which the media was invited to attend, given by officials from the Department of Citizenship and Immigration prior to a press conference by the minister regarding the department’s immigrant investor program. In his decision, he reviewed a number of precedents and concluded that the matter did not constitute a prima facie question of privilege. The Speaker stated: On December 1, 1992 when a member complained that the media had been given information by the government concerning financial assistance to Canadian Airlines when the same information was denied to members of Parliament, Speaker Fraser ruled [at] page 14360 of the Debates there was no question of privilege. He also reminded the House that: Privilege is properly raised only when something has happened that makes it impossible or nearly impossible to carry out the obligations that a member has as a member of this House. On December 15, 1987, a member objected to the fact that the government had established a press lock-up and briefing regarding a proposed agricultural program and that members were denied access to the information. Speaker Fraser’s ruling which can be found at page 11788 of the Debates, stated that this was not a prima facie question of privilege because it did not impinge on the member’s ability to carry on his duties as a member of Parliament. In the matter submitted by the member for Surrey—White Rock—South Langley, the Chair cannot find that she has been obstructed in the performance of her parliamentary duties. The question raised did not involve access to parliamentary proceedings, either in the Chamber or in a committee meeting room. Ultimately, as the hon. member pointed out in her presentation, the officials offered to give her the same briefing after question period. On the issue of contempt, I would refer again to Speaker Fraser. In a ruling given on October 10, 1989, Speaker Fraser said: “Broadly speaking, contempts are offences against the authority or the dignity of the House of Commons”. Does the fact that the media was given information before it was going to be made available to the member constitute a contempt of the House of Commons? At page 125 of the 21st edition of Erskine May, in chapter 9 dealing with contempts, it is stated: The House will proceed against those who obstruct members in the discharge of their responsibilities to the House or in their participation in its proceedings. It seems to me that members of Parliament were not denied information or obstructed in their duties in the House. There was, after all, a press conference scheduled for that same morning and it was broadcast on the closed circuit television system of the House, making it accessible to all members. The Chair finds it difficult to conclude that the actions in question were an affront to the authority and dignity of the House. For the reasons previously stated and in light of the precedents dealing with similar matters, I do not consider that this is a prima facie case of privilege. The Speaker has no control and should have no control over such events, whether it be the manner in which they are organized or how access to them is managed.

Statements by Members ·

Byron Springbank Veterans Monument

“A new veterans monument opened in Springbank Park. I want to thank the community and the military members who made it possible, and honor those who served.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, in Springbank Park, 14 life-sized steel figures now stand in a circle, soldiers and peacekeepers, side by side. We can walk around them, and they almost seem to move. People can scan a QR code and learn the stories of those who have served, and serve, our great country. This is the Byron Springbank Veterans Monument, designed by artist Kay Jang. Nearly 20 years in the making, it started as Reverend Frank Mantz’s dream. The Byron-Springbank Legion Branch 533, with the whole community behind it, made it real. The Legion now has a permanent home for Remembrance Day, and every Londoner has a daily reminder of what we owe to those who served for our freedoms. I was proud to join the dedication on October 3. To the Legion, Veterans Affairs Canada, the Byron Springbank Veterans Monument consortium, every volunteer, every donor, every family and every member of the Canadian Armed Forces who serves, who has served and who will serve in the future, we want to take this moment to thank them, with the monument and with every single action that we take in this country. We owe it to them for our freedoms.

Government Orders ·

Business of the House

“I want the House to agree to speed up debate and pass the bill to pause the fuel tax quickly.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, if you seek it, I think you will find unanimous consent for the following motion, which is seconded by the leader of the official opposition: That, notwithstanding any standing order or usual practice of the House, Bill C-38, An Act to amend the Excise Tax Act (extension of the federal fuel excise tax relief), be disposed of as follows: (a) the bill be ordered for consideration at the second reading stage on Tuesday, September 22, 2026; (b) on Tuesday, September 22, 2026, the House shall continue to sit until midnight for the purpose of considering this bill, provided that, after 7 p.m., no quorum calls, dilatory motions or requests for unanimous consent shall be received by the Chair, and when no member wishes to speak or at midnight, whichever is earlier, the bill shall be deemed read a second time on division and referred to the Standing Committee on Finance; (c) the Minister of Finance and National Revenue be ordered to appear before the Standing Committee on Finance in relation to the bill for one hour, no later than Tuesday, October 6, 2026, followed by an additional hour to gather evidence from witnesses, and immediately after, the committee proceed to clause-by-clause consideration of the bill; (d) the motion for third reading of the bill may be made in the same sitting during which the said bill has been concurred in at report stage; (e) at the expiry of the time provided for Government Orders on the day the bill is considered at the third reading stage, or when no member wishes to speak, whichever is earlier, the bill shall be deemed read a third time and passed on division.

Government Orders ·

Government Business No. 12—Proceedings on Bill C-30

“The opposition says they are not wasting time, but they told a story about an elephant instead of talking about housing. I want the minister to address how they are delaying money that people need to build homes.”
Official Hansard

Madam Speaker, earlier a member of the opposition talked about the fact that they were not filibustering, yet she was the one who actually told the story about an elephant in a discussion of Bill C-30, where there is money that has to go out to people who need more housing in a faster way. Could the minister talk about the fact that while opposition members continue to say we are stopping debate, they are talking about elephants in a debate about money that needs to go out for the construction of housing?

Government Orders ·

Strong and Free Elections Act

“All parties worked together on this election bill with outside experts to move it quickly. I want the Conservatives to say what parts of the bill they support and what parts they do not.”
Official Hansard

Earlier, Mr. Speaker, the member’s colleague who sits on committee with me said he feels we are not listening. I talked about the fact that we did extensive collaboration. This is one of the most fast-tracked bills that I personally have witnessed since I have been a member of Parliament, because of the expert input we brought on and the collaboration that happened between all parties in the House. Can the member comment on what exactly in this bill the Conservatives cannot support and what they can support?

“We worked together on this bill to protect our elections. I want the member to tell us which parts he supports and which parts he does not.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, what I find interesting from the member opposite, who also sits on the committee with me, is the fact that he said he is not buying what we are selling, though we worked in collaboration with their team to bring the bill forward as quickly as possible. Maybe he could help all members of the House let Canadians know which parts of the bill he supports and which he does not support.

“I want my colleague to explain how this bill will help Canadians. I also want him to talk about how different parties worked together to move it forward so quickly.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I really appreciated my colleague’s speech. Of course, we all know that our systems and institutions are very robust in Canada, and I know my hon. colleague touched on that in his speech. Can he tell us more about what Canadians stand to gain from this bill? I would also like to hear him speak about the collaboration that made it possible to move this bill forward in a very short time.

Government Orders ·

Government Business No. 11—Proceedings on Bill C-26

“The member is not talking about the bill. He should stay on topic.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I am trying to see the relevance of my colleague’s comments to Bill C-26. We have allowed him to continue for some time now, and it is getting completely out of hand.

In response to a question from Mario Beaulieu

“We cannot build homes without working with cities and provinces. My city of London got housing money because of this kind of teamwork. Why is working with mayors and provinces so important to building homes quickly?”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, obviously, the member has been at the municipal level before, and we know that we cannot build homes without cities and without partnerships with the provinces and municipalities. My city of London has been a great example of how those partnerships have yielded a lot of funding from the housing accelerator fund, yet we have seen the opposition take jabs at mayors. Can you talk about the importance of partnerships with mayors and provinces to make sure that we can build the homes that are needed across Canada fast?

Government Orders ·

Government Orders

In response to a question from Tamara Kronis

“I want us to inform Canadians honestly instead of misleading them.”
  • Reply to a debate question

    Relevance 49 of 100

    None of this reply addressed the specific point raised or the topic under debate.

    See full analysis
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I used to be a staffer here. I remember a time when we all used our time in the House to inform Canadians, not mislead them, not switch information to sound like what it is not. I really want us to get back to that place.

In response to a question from Élisabeth Brière

“We need this bill to keep protecting our elections and maintain trust in them. We are following advice from experts and the Chief Electoral Officer.”
Official Hansard

Mr. Speaker, I deeply appreciate my colleague, who is also a member of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs. She took part in a number of discussions with experts and witnesses that highlighted the importance of protecting our elections. As I mentioned earlier, we are following the recommendations of the Chief Electoral Officer and other experts. The world is changing. We know that we already have a robust system, but we have to keep putting security measures in place to protect our elections and maintain Canadians’ trust in our institutions.