Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Arielle Kayabaga

Liberal on Government Orders 2026-06-10

90 words · 5 sentences · 6 clauses

Replying to Élisabeth Brière (Liberal)

“Bill C‑25 aims to strengthen and secure the electoral process, particularly by fighting foreign interference and other emerging threats. I would like my colleague to explain why it was so important to make these changes and follow through on this bill.”

Statement grade

Average 77 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Thanks 43%Claims 33%Reasoning 23%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Thanks · 39 wordsI deeply appreciate my colleague, who is also a member of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs.¹ She took part in a number of discussions with experts and witnesses that highlighted the importance of protecting our elections.Thanks Claims · 30 wordsAs I mentioned earlier, we are following the recommendations of the Chief Electoral Officer and other experts. The world is changing. We know that we already have a robust system, Reasoning · 21 wordsbut we have to keep putting security measures in place to protect our elections and maintain Canadians’ trust in our institutions.Vague promise

At a glance

Lost points for

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 52

2 of 3 deductions are Signal

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Thanks and tributes.What the tags mean “I deeply appreciate my colleague, who is also a member of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs.”Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.
Thanks and tributes.What the tags mean “She took part in a number of discussions with experts and witnesses that highlighted the importance of protecting our elections.”Thanks: no claim, reason or ask.

Relevance · 100

0 of 3 deductions are Relevance

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the point put to the member, and the bill under debate.

Nothing lost points.

Respect · 100

0 of 3 deductions are Respect

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Nothing lost points.

Clarity · 56

1 of 3 deductions are Clarity

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible.What the tags mean “we have to keep putting security measures in place”No specific measure, date or success condition is named for the security action committed to.

Claims · 1

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“my colleague, who is also a member of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs”Élisabeth Brière is a member of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20