Mel Arnold

Mr. Speaker, Greeting · 14 wordsit is an honour to rise today as the elected representative for Kamloops—Shuswap—Central Rockies.Greeting Positioning · 132 wordsAs I have previously stated in this place, all of us have a solemn responsibility to provide representation and voice to those citizens who voted for us and depend on us to be their voice here in Parliament. Canadians need us to be vigilant, and they depend on us to be their voice. We have to be ready for the challenges and dangers that emerge, and I accept that responsibility with sincere dedication to the amazing people of Kamloops—Shuswap—Central Rockies and the people of Canada. We must all take actions to prevent, mitigate and overcome challenges and dangers, including the the unintended consequences caused by the actions or the inactions of levels of government. In these times of global uncertainty, Canadians need our vigilance and actions more than at any other time.PositioningOff point Thanks · 55 wordsAs I begin speaking to this bill, Bill C-25, the strong and free elections act, I would like to thank all of the Elections Canada workers, from the electoral district returning officers to the poll workers, the volunteers and the ever-important scrutineers who are such an important part of our democratic system here in Canada.Thanks Procedure · 10 wordsI will speak to components of this bill, Bill C-25, ProcedureClaims · 53 wordsand how parts of it are overdue while other parts need further debate and consideration for what is best for Canada and Canadians’ interests. After the 2021 federal election, Canadians were alarmed to hear of foreign interference in the election of candidates and members sent here to represent and defend this country’s interests.⁶ Positioning · 7 wordsThe Liberals say they care about democracy, PositioningClaims · 93 wordsyet they have allowed foreign actors to brazenly interfere in our elections. It was only after the Liberals got caught turning a blind eye to Beijing’s interference that they finally introduced legislation to establish a foreign influence registry in Canada. However, two years after passing that bill into law, there is still no registry.⁷ So far, we have had date after date promised and date after date missed. After years of opposing a foreign influence registry, including Conservative efforts to create one, the Liberals’ latest tactic appears to be one of endless delay. The ask · 24 wordsIt is time for the Liberal government to finally take foreign interference seriously. It is time to get a registry up and running, today. Claims · 292 wordsI must say that this is uncannily similar to an issue dealt with in my role as associate shadow minister for fisheries, and that is the issue of foreign ownership of licences and quota on the west coast. The last Conservative government put in motion policies to stop the issue of controlling agreements between processors and harvesters on the east coast, ⁸where processors were limiting harvesters’ choice of where they landed their catch and how much they received for their catch. In the following years, legislation and regulations were put in place to end those controlling agreements and protect local fish harvesters and their communities on the east coast.⁹ In May 2019, the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans tabled a report titled “West Coast Fisheries: ⁴Sharing Risks and Benefits”. In that report, there were 20 recommendations to government that would have helped meet the aspirations of fish harvesters, especially young fishers, to carry on their careers and family traditions and contribute to building economically, socially and culturally vibrant west coast communities.¹⁰ In 2023, four years later, that same fisheries committee undertook another study to produce yet another report, titled “Foreign Ownership and Corporate Concentration of Fishing Licences and Quota”.⁵ The testimony we heard during that second report was alarming in that after four years, the government had taken almost no action to identify who the beneficial owners of licences and quota are on the west coast. In fact, what we basically heard was that it has no idea. It is now seven years since that first report on the issue was tabled in the House, ¹¹and the Liberal government has yet to address the issue and put in place any significant measures to protect our independent harvesters on the west coast.Logical leap Reasoning · 18 wordsThat is why I say that Bill C-25 and the west coast fisheries issues have something in common. Positioning · 5 wordsIt is delay, delay, delay.Positioning Claims · 25 wordsIf the Liberals do not find it important enough to create a foreign influence registry or to investigate whether foreign entities own licences and quotas, Promise · 15 wordsand who controls, catches and processes our Canadian seafood, then Conservatives will hold them accountable, Vague promisePositioning · 12 wordsand we hope that Canadians will expect that accountability from their government.PositioningOff point Claims · 242 wordsAnother component of the bill that I want Canadians to be aware of is the third party financing loophole. Bill C-25 would create a wide open loophole through which foreign money could still be used by third parties for partisan activity, partisan advertising and election surveying. Specifically, if contributions to a third party amount to 10% or less of its annual revenue in the year prior to a fixed election year, it could use its own funds to pay for, among other things, partisan activity and advertising.² A third party’s own funds do not have to come from Canadian citizens or permanent residents and do not have to be reported in the same way.³ With fixed election periods, it is very easy for third parties and foreign interests to predict when an election may be.¹² A foreign interest could funnel money into a third party for two or three years ahead of schedule, which would then be treated as part of the third party’s own funds. Further, 10% sounds like a small number, but it may not be. There are third parties that have a lot of money. What constitutes 10% or less of a third party’s revenue coming from contributions may in fact be millions of dollars. This means that very large third parties would be able to use their own funds for election-related expenses. Disappointingly, the Liberals voted against our amendments to close these wide open loopholes in the bill.¹ Reasoning · 33 wordsI raise these points as part of this debate because that is what we as elected representatives are sent here to do, to scrutinize legislation and make it the best it can be. Claims · 22 wordsWhat we have seen from the government since I first came here in 2015 is not the best legislation it could be.Partly on point Promise · 25 wordsConservatives will continue to call on the Liberal government to strengthen Canada’s position against foreign actors who seek to influence our economies and our democracy.Vague promise