Analysis · Debate question · beta

Dave Epp

Conservative on Bail and Sentencing Reform Act 2026-06-12

77 words · 3 sentences · 3 clauses

Statement grade

–

Not graded

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 53%The question 47%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 41 wordsa few minutes ago, the Minister of Justice referenced the procedural tools of the trade that are used. He decried the Conservative Party’s use of the tools in the past and justified the use of the tools in this present hour.¹ The question · 36 wordsHow is the Conservative Party’s use of procedural tools equivalent when comparing what is being done to stifle debate at the health committee by going in camera on PrescribeIT versus what we are witnessing here today?

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

Nothing lost points on Signal.

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 100

Nothing lost points on Respect.

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Clarity · 100

Nothing lost points on Clarity.

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Claims · 1

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“decried the Conservative Party’s use of the tools in the past and justified the use of the tools in this present hour”During the June 12, 2026 debate on the time allocation motion for Bill C-14, the Minister of Justice criticized the Conservative Party’s past use of procedural tools while justifying their use now.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20