“Mr. Speaker, I want to thank the member for getting to the crux of the challenges with bail reform and the fact that, when this bill went through the House, it was supported completely. The issue around sureties was discussed and an amendment was unanimously agreed to by all parties in this chamber before it went to the Senate. I do find it somewhat hypocritical of the government to not reject this amendment, like the other amendments that have come back from the Senate on this bill. As the member indicated, it creates vagueness. I know the member referred to rural crime. I have the same challenge in my riding of Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound, where the same repeat offenders, who are robbing our farmers and our rural people, are getting back out on bail. That is why we need bail reform so badly after 11 years of the Liberal government. I am now concerned that, with this loophole in the bill, these people, who do have to convince the judge, will have the ability to get back out when they should be spending time in jail if they cannot find somebody to cover for them or to be their surety.”
Statement grade
A+
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity.
Average 98 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Procedure 5%Claims 52%Reasoning 42%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 7 wordsit goes again to the same thing, ProcedureClaims · 12 wordswhich is the confidence the Canadian public demands of Canada’s justice system.Reasoning · 29 wordsIf there are loopholes in the system, then the bad guys will learn how to use them.They will figure out how to convince unreasonable leniency from the courts.Claims · 57 wordsTo the Bloc member’s point, I have numerous cases of events here in Bow River and around southern Alberta where the judges just did not bother to write the reasons down.1It was arbitrary.There are so many things that go into this circumstance about resources to police and resources to the judiciary that contribute to this.Reasoning · 27 wordsI grant that.However, that should not be a free pass for Parliament to water down legislation when we had already unanimously clear expectations in the legislation.