“Madam Speaker, the way the Conservative Party of Canada is marginalizing something that has touched the lives of thousands over the years, in regard to the whole noose debate, is somewhat sad. Let me give a specific example that the member might not be aware of but is the reality of the situation. Senator Bernard, out for a walk, was confronted in her home community by a group, particularly an individual, that was using the physical noose. Now, she is of Black heritage and someone who is very proud to be a Canadian. I wonder what the member thinks about that sort of an incident. Does she believe that the noose is in fact used as a tool, at times, of extreme racist actions like what Senator Bernard had to physically go through? I would suggest the senator is not alone.”
Statement grade
F
The average of Signal, Relevance, Respect and Clarity is 65. The grade is held to 30, 30 above Signal.
30 / 100, held down by Signal
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Positioning 100%
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Positioning · 50 wordsYes, Madam Speaker, under the Liberals, Off pointand this hatred that they are promoting, I can believe that this incident happened, and it is unacceptable.However, given how the Liberals expand laws and try to encompass innocent people into law–breaking, they cannot be trusted with adding these symbols to the bill.PositioningPartly on point
