Analysis · Debate question · beta

Greg Fergus

52 words · 3 sentences · 4 clauses

Following a speech by Kevin Lamoureux (Liberal)
“Madam Speaker, absolutely. I wish I would be given the time to give a full answer on it. When people go to the voting booth, they exercise their vote, and the names of the local candidates are on the ballot. However, to deny the fact that people vote for the leader of political parties, the party itself and the local candidate is to deny reality. At the end of the day, people contrasted our Prime Minister to the leader of the official opposition and others. Ultimately, the support garnered for the leader helped a lot of Liberal candidates get elected in the last federal election. With respect to time allocation, I can say to my friend opposite that Peter Van Loan, who sat two desks ahead of me, would do the same sort of thing. He brought time allocation over 100 times in the last few years of the Harper government.”
Statement grade
A
Average 93 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 62%The question 38%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Madam Speaker, Claims · 32 wordsthe hon. parliamentary secretary made reference to one of the symbols noted in the amendment, which is the noose.1 As he knows, it is an issue of particular importance to Black Canadians.Unearned certainty The question · 20 wordsI wonder if he could discuss why it is important to list symbols such as the noose as hate symbols.

Analysed on