Analysis · Question Period question · beta

Roman Baber

Conservative on Public Safety 2026-06-17

120 words · 5 sentences · 9 clauses

Statement grade

A+

Average 100 / 100

A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.

Claims 76%The question 24%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 91 wordspart 2 of Bill C‑22 would force providers to retain the metadata of all Canadians.¹ Liberals say the data is no different than the phone book, but the phone book did not log every phone call in every location of every Canadian for the last 12 months. There are also real concerns that foreign actors would exploit a back door to encryption. Law-abiding Canadians do not want their privacy breached, but Liberals are cutting off debate and ramming the bill through.² Part 2 is not ready to be passed into law, The question · 29 wordsso will the Liberals work with us to pass part 1 of Bill C‑22, but pause on part 2 to allow us to fix the bulk of this bill?

At a glance

Nothing lost points.

Choose a measurement above to see how it scored.

Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.

What the tags mean

Signal · 100

Nothing lost points on Signal.

Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.

Relevance · no score

Not applicable: nothing to answer. Excluded from the average.

Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue.

Respect · 100

Nothing lost points on Respect.

Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.

Clarity · 100

Nothing lost points on Clarity.

Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.

Claims · 2

This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.

1“part 2 of Bill C‑22 would force providers to retain the metadata of all Canadians”Part 2 of Bill C-22 would require service providers to retain the metadata of all Canadians.search
2“cutting off debate and ramming the bill through”The government is limiting debate on Bill C-22 in the House.search

Analysed on 2026-10-20