Martin Champoux

Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 16 wordsI am pleased to speak to Bill C-268, which is sponsored by the member for Compton—Stanstead.¹Procedure Anecdote · 14 wordsThis is a bill that I am particularly interested in, given my professional background.AnecdoteOff point Claims · 16 wordsThe bill concerns the spectrum policy framework for Canada. The French word for spectrum is “spectre”. Aside · 36 wordsIf Quebeckers and Canadians were asked what that makes them think of, 99.9% of them would probably mention ghosts or James Bond villains. Very few of them would talk about frequencies, airwaves or broadcasting in general.AsideOff point Claims · 18 wordsHowever, spectrum is absolutely essential to broadcasting and communications as we have known them today and for decades. Anecdote · 38 wordsThere is a reason why this topic is of interest to me. Before I got into politics, I dabbled in various fields, including radio. I worked at radio stations for three decades.² That might be hard to believe.Anecdote Aside · 31 wordsSome might say that this is impossible, because that would mean that I had to have started at the age of five or six, and they would not be far off.Aside Anecdote · 82 wordsIn any case, I spent many years in this fascinating industry.Off point Issues related to spectrum, airwaves and broadcasting involve the technical side of the field that I was in and was genuinely passionate about. Back in my day, although we are not talking about the 1920s or 1930s, we did not have this level of congestion. Regulations were in place, and the government was exercising some control over frequency usage, but it was not as important back then as it is today.Anecdote Claims · 79 wordsIt has been quite a while since this policy was last revised. It was revised in 1992 and again 15 years later, in 2007.³ Now, in 2026, almost 20 years later, we find ourselves needing to review these regulations and this framework. In recent years, municipalities have begun implementing regulations to prevent owners from leaving vacant downtown lots unused. These lots must be developed because we need the space to alleviate congestion and we lack space to build housing. Reasoning · 29 wordsThe same principle applies here. That is the analogy I would use to explain why spectrum allocation and frequency usage need to be managed in much the same way. Claims · 59 wordsThere are telecommunications companies that have acquired frequencies but do not need to develop them or lack the resources to do so, because developing these services is quite expensive. As a result, they are holding these unused frequencies that could be put to other uses. We have heard the industry call for more deregulation, rather than a stronger framework. Reasoning · 17 wordsI feel a little uneasy about that request, particularly in this case. We need to reach everyone. Claims · 38 wordsThe argument we often hear from the industry is that 99% of the country is covered, that 99% of people have access to LTE or 5G technology, ⁴and that soon people will have access to the next technology. Aside · 6 wordsIt might be 6G; who knows.Aside Reasoning · 28 wordsNow, 99% does seem like a lot of people. Yes, that is true. It is good. It is much better than it was just a few years ago, Claims · 63 wordsbut it still means that over 200,000 people do not have access to a cellular network.⁵ In 2026, not having access to a cellular network is, of course, a problem for communication. It is certainly a problem when it comes to entertainment. Nowadays, entertainment is increasingly delivered through our electronic devices, our cellphones and tablets. In some cases, it is through our computers, Reasoning · 43 wordsbut the fact remains that we need this system, these frequencies. We can say that those 200,000 people who do not have access to entertainment can always read a book or go play outside. Yes, there is always a way to make do, Claims · 65 wordsbut these 200,000 people also do not have access to emergency safety services.⁶ We have seen cases where this mattered. There have been situations where people needed to call the fire department or an ambulance urgently—after an accident or during a forest fire, since wildfires sometimes cut off regular communications where they are usually available—but were unable to access even the most basic emergency services. Reasoning · 43 wordsThis is a cause for concern. This is a cause for concern, and there is no reason why we should be prevented from providing this service simply because the companies do not want to develop it, even though they hold the required spectrum. Claims · 13 wordsPeople get the impression that everything is fine because almost everyone is connected. Reasoning · 26 wordsHowever, we are talking about an essential service. It becomes an essential service as soon as there is an incident like the ones I just mentioned. Claims · 52 wordsBill C-268 contains meaningful, positive measures that will improve the current situation. People in rural areas, such as Drummond, will no longer have to wave their phones around trying to get a signal. These measures are primarily aimed at ensuring that unused spectrum is put to use in one way or another. Reasoning · 42 wordsI think it is a waste to hold these resources and not take the necessary steps to use them, particularly in regions and situations where there is a pressing need that must be addressed. I also like the idea of delivery timetables. Claims · 50 wordsAccording to Bill C‑268, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission, ⁷or CRTC, would be required to act within a fairly short time frame of six months after the act’s coming into force. It seems to me that the CRTC already has a rather large backlog of urgent matters to address, Reasoning · 13 wordsso entrusting it with managing this bill as a priority might be risky. Claims · 17 wordsThere is a history of inaction at times due to the excessive workload that the CRTC faces. Reasoning · 23 wordsHowever, if everything goes well, we could already see results within six months of the bill’s passage and implementation. I find that encouraging. Claims · 131 wordsThe other thing is that there would be a verification process to ensure the accuracy of data, such as mobile coverage data. When we check with companies that provide mobile phone services, we often get responses that do not accurately reflect the situation on the ground. We have seen this happen. I, for one, have been told that my region has 100% coverage and that there is no reason for there to be any problems. However, when we are passing through the rural parts of our ridings, it is rare not to come across areas where communications literally cut out and where there is no signal at all. It is very frustrating, once again, to be told that 100% of the territory is covered when we run into situations like that. Positioning · 43 wordsWhat are we waiting for? Are we waiting for something serious to happen before we realize that cell service has become something that we can no longer do without and for which we have an obligation to establish mechanisms to ensure reliable service?Positioning Claims · 57 wordsFor now, obviously, that is not yet the case. There would be a process to ensure the accuracy of mobile coverage data provided by telecommunications companies as well as data on network deployment.⁸ In short, there would be more transparency, more efficiency and a better overview of the situation. These are easy things to put in place. Reasoning · 21 wordsHowever, I will say it again, the argument that 99% and a bit of the population is covered is not enough. Claims · 8 wordsThat is much better than 10 years ago, Thanks · 6 wordsso congratulations may be in order.Thanks Reasoning · 33 wordsHowever, I find it extremely concerning that there are even a few people in this context who do not have access to basic security and emergency services. This requires us to act quickly.Vague promise Procedure · 22 wordsOn that note, I think it is pretty clear that the Bloc Québécois will support Bill C‑268 from my colleague from Compton—Stanstead.⁹Procedure