Procedure 3% Positioning 18% Anecdote 8% Promise 4% Reasoning 8% Claims 57% The ask 1%
Structure · 26 steps
Claims · 11
Echo · said 4 times
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Procedure · 23 words I am very grateful to be here today for the debate at report stage of Bill C‑11, the military justice system modernization act. Procedure Positioning · 38 words As Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of National Defence, I have the privilege and responsibility of supporting the women and men who serve Canada in uniform. I believe that responsibility is shared by all members of the House. Positioning Anecdote · 91 words As the mother and mother-in-law of three serving members of the Canadian Armed Forces, I know first-hand that members of the Canadian Armed Forces are among the very best of our country: skilled, dedicated, professional and deeply committed to something greater than themselves. I have had the privilege of meeting many of them, and each time, I am reminded of a simple truth: We ask a great deal of them. We ask them to serve in uncertainty, to operate in high-risk environments and to put service before self every single day. Anecdote Positioning · 18 words In return, we have a responsibility, a collective responsibility, to ensure they have everything they need to succeed. Positioning Promise · 29 words That includes the right equipment, the right training and, critically, the right environment. It must be a safe, respectful and dignified environment. It must be a healthy work environment, Reasoning · 21 words where everyone feels protected and able to serve, because serving one’s country should never come at the expense of one’s dignity. Claims · 32 words Eliminating unacceptable behaviours, including sexual misconduct, is central to that responsibility. These behaviours cause real harm. They erode trust. They damage morale. They impact recruitment and retention. Ultimately, they weaken operational effectiveness. Positioning · 59 words There is no place for this in our military. There is no place for this in Canada. That is why today’s debate is so important. Cultural change and growth within the Canadian Armed Forces is simply too important to be exploited for political or partisan gain. Our military members deserve better, their families deserve better and Canadians deserve better. Positioning Off point Claims · 184 words Through Bill C-11, we are proposing important amendments to the National Defence Act to modernize the military justice system. The legislation is about ensuring that the system remains fair, effective and worthy of the trust Canadians place in it. At its core, it would strengthen accountability, reinforce independence and ensure alignment with the values Canadians expect. As introduced, Bill C-11 would remove CAF jurisdiction over Criminal Code sexual offences committed in Canada.1 These offences would instead fall under civilian authorities for investigation and prosecution. This reflects the practice already in place since 2021, following the interim recommendation of former Supreme Court justice Louise Arbour, 2 and this legislation would formalize that approach. I would like to note that the interim directive has been an effective measure while we await the passage of Bill C-11. The interim directive to implement recommendation five has been in place since December 2021, 3 and since then, all new charges of sexual offences under the Criminal Code have been brought in the civilian justice system .4 Bill C-11 proposes to solidify this interim directive and make it permanent, as Justice Arbour recommended. Positioning · 25 words Any attempt to undermine or undercut the progress made in the past five years under the interim directive is a disservice to victims and survivors. Positioning Off point Claims · 53 words I note that Bill C-11 also advances key recommendations from former Supreme Court justice Morris Fish to strengthen the system’s effectiveness and credibility.5 These include strengthening and modernizing appointment processes for senior military justice roles, broadening eligibility for military judges, reinforcing the independence of military justice authorities and expanding mechanisms for interference complaints. Positioning · 18 words These are not technical adjustments. They are foundational reforms. They go directly to the integrity of the system. Positioning Claims · 62 words The bill also strengthens support for victims by expanding access to liaison officers, including those acting on behalf of victims.6 It also aligns military justice legislation with recent amendments to the Criminal Code regarding offenders and publication bans.7 The military justice system is about maintaining discipline, efficiency and morale within the Canadian Armed Forces. Modernizing it is essential for lasting institutional reform. Procedure · 4 words Our objective is clear. Procedure Claims · 14 words It is to strengthen trust and confidence among defence team members and all Canadians. Positioning · 16 words Trust must be at the heart of any justice system. Trust must be earned through action. Positioning Claims · 39 words The changes proposed in Bill C-11 are part of a much broader transformation. We are undertaking meaningful reforms across recruitment, training, leadership and oversight. Vague promise In fact, this week the Canadian Armed Forces reached its highest recruitment in 30 years.8 Positioning · 6 words This is excellent news for Canada, Positioning Reasoning · 31 words but we must not lose sight of the important work we are doing to ensure that the next generation of the Canadian Armed Forces has a safe and supportive work environment. Promise · 18 words I can assure members that we are fully committed to implementing the recommendations of Justices Fish and Arbour. Unearned certainty Claims · 157 words These recommendations provide a road map for concrete and measurable change. We have strengthened our recruitment and assessment processes. A probationary period now ensures that recruits comply with security requirements, meet medical standards and, above all, possess the values expected of those who serve their country: respect, dignity and integrity. We have clarified how sexual misconduct is defined and addressed, breaking it into clearer categories so that each form can be dealt with appropriately. We have aligned our approach to harassment and violence with the Canada Labour Code, creating a single, consistent framework across the defence team.9 We have enabled direct access to the Canadian Human Rights Commission in certain cases because transparency and accountability are essential to cultural change.10 We continue to track progress publicly through our comprehensive implementation plan, a detailed road map that Canadians can see and follow. As noted by the external monitor, Jocelyne Therrien, there has been significant effort and meaningful progress, 11 Reasoning · 33 words but she also reminded us of something important. This work is never finished. Creating a respectful and inclusive workplace is an ongoing commitment. It is one that requires sustained leadership, accountability and commitment. Off point Claims · 75 words The measures in Bill C-11 represent an important step forward. More than that, they represent progress: progress toward a military justice system that reflects our values, progress toward a workplace where every member can serve with dignity and progress toward rebuilding and reinforcing trust. It is a step to better protect those who serve and to build a safer, more respectful environment. It is also a step towards building confidence in our military justice system. Positioning · 19 words We owe this to the women and men of the Canadian Armed Forces. We owe this to all Canadians. Positioning The ask · 13 words Let us continue this work together. Let us get this done for them. Off point
At a glance
Lost points for Off point ×49 Positioning ×17 Anecdote ×6 Procedure ×2 Vague promise Unearned certainty
Echo ×4 “All new charges of sexual offences under the Criminal Code have been brought in the civilian justice system.” Said 4 times by 4 members. Every time it was said →
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 65
25 of 76 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “I am very grateful to be here today for the debate at report stage of Bill C‑11, the military justice system modernization act.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “As Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of National Defence, I have the privilege and responsibility of supporting the women and men who serve Canada in uniform.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “I believe that responsibility is shared by all members of the House.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Anecdote A story that illustrates instead of making a point. What the tags mean → “As the mother and mother-in-law of three serving members of the Canadian Armed Forces, I know first-hand that members of the Canadian Armed Forces are among the very best of our country:” An anecdote: it illustrates, it does not claim, reason or ask.
Anecdote A story that illustrates instead of making a point. What the tags mean → “skilled, dedicated, professional and deeply committed to something greater than themselves.” An anecdote: it illustrates, it does not claim, reason or ask.
Anecdote A story that illustrates instead of making a point. What the tags mean → “I have had the privilege of meeting many of them,” An anecdote: it illustrates, it does not claim, reason or ask.
Anecdote A story that illustrates instead of making a point. What the tags mean → “and each time, I am reminded of a simple truth:” An anecdote: it illustrates, it does not claim, reason or ask.
Anecdote A story that illustrates instead of making a point. What the tags mean → “We ask a great deal of them.” An anecdote: it illustrates, it does not claim, reason or ask.
Anecdote A story that illustrates instead of making a point. What the tags mean → “We ask them to serve in uncertainty, to operate in high-risk environments and to put service before self every single day.” An anecdote: it illustrates, it does not claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “In return, we have a responsibility, a collective responsibility, to ensure they have everything they need to succeed.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “There is no place for this in our military.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “There is no place for this in Canada.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “That is why today’s debate is so important.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Cultural change and growth within the Canadian Armed Forces is simply too important to be exploited for political or partisan gain.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Our military members deserve better, their families deserve better and Canadians deserve better.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Any attempt to undermine or undercut the progress made in the past five years under the interim directive is a disservice to victims and survivors.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “These are not technical adjustments.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “They are foundational reforms.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “They go directly to the integrity of the system.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Procedure Throat-clearing: announcing what you are about to say, or the House’s routine business. What the tags mean → “Our objective is clear.” Procedure or throat-clearing: no claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Trust must be at the heart of any justice system.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “Trust must be earned through action.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “This is excellent news for Canada,” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We owe this to the women and men of the Canadian Armed Forces.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “We owe this to all Canadians.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 40
49 of 76 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “As Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of National Defence, I have the privilege and responsibility of supporting the women and men who serve Canada in uniform.” Speaks to the speaker’s own role rather than the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I believe that responsibility is shared by all members of the House.” General sentiment about shared responsibility, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “As the mother and mother-in-law of three serving members of the Canadian Armed Forces, I know first-hand that members of the Canadian Armed Forces are among the very best of our country:” Personal family background unrelated to the bill’s provisions.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “skilled, dedicated, professional and deeply committed to something greater than themselves.” Praise of military members, not the legislation.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I have had the privilege of meeting many of them,” Anecdote about meeting members, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “and each time, I am reminded of a simple truth:” Continues the personal anecdote rather than addressing the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We ask a great deal of them.” General statement about service, not the legislation.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We ask them to serve in uncertainty, to operate in high-risk environments and to put service before self every single day.” Describes demands of service without reference to the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “In return, we have a responsibility, a collective responsibility, to ensure they have everything they need to succeed.” General responsibility statement, not the bill’s measures.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “That includes the right equipment, the right training and, critically, the right environment.” General statement about equipment and training, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It must be a safe, respectful and dignified environment.” General aspiration about work environment, not the bill’s provisions.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It must be a healthy work environment,” General aspiration, not the legislation.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “where everyone feels protected and able to serve,” General aspiration, not the legislation.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “because serving one’s country should never come at the expense of one’s dignity.” General sentiment, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Eliminating unacceptable behaviours, including sexual misconduct, is central to that responsibility.” General statement about eliminating misconduct, not the bill’s specific measures.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “These behaviours cause real harm.” General point about harm, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “They erode trust.” General point about trust, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “They damage morale.” General point about morale, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “They impact recruitment and retention.” General point about recruitment, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Ultimately, they weaken operational effectiveness.” General point about effectiveness, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “There is no place for this in our military.” General condemnation, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “There is no place for this in Canada.” Rhetorical point beyond the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “That is why today’s debate is so important.” Comment on the importance of the debate rather than the bill’s content.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Cultural change and growth within the Canadian Armed Forces is simply too important to be exploited for political or partisan gain.” Political point accusing others of exploiting the issue in place of addressing the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Our military members deserve better, their families deserve better and Canadians deserve better.” Political flourish rather than the bill’s provisions.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Any attempt to undermine or undercut the progress made in the past five years under the interim directive is a disservice to victims and survivors.” Political warning directed at opponents rather than the bill’s content.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “The changes proposed in Bill C-11 are part of a much broader transformation.” Pivots to broader transformation beyond the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We are undertaking meaningful reforms across recruitment, training, leadership and oversight.” Recruitment, training and leadership reforms outside the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “In fact, this week the Canadian Armed Forces reached its highest recruitment in 30 years.” Recruitment statistic, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “This is excellent news for Canada,” Comment on the recruitment figure, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “but we must not lose sight of the important work we are doing to ensure that the next generation of the Canadian Armed Forces has a safe and supportive work environment.” General commitment to work environment, not the bill’s provisions.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I can assure members that we are fully committed to implementing the recommendations of Justices Fish and Arbour.” Broader implementation commitment beyond the bill under debate.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “These recommendations provide a road map for concrete and measurable change.” About the reports’ recommendations generally, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We have strengthened our recruitment and assessment processes.” Recruitment process change outside the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “A probationary period now ensures that recruits comply with security requirements, meet medical standards and, above all, possess the values expected of those who serve their country:” Recruitment process detail, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “respect, dignity and integrity.” Values statement, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We have clarified how sexual misconduct is defined and addressed, breaking it into clearer categories so that each form can be dealt with appropriately.” Misconduct definition change outside the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We have aligned our approach to harassment and violence with the Canada Labour Code, creating a single, consistent framework across the defence team.” Harassment framework change outside the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We have enabled direct access to the Canadian Human Rights Commission in certain cases because transparency and accountability are essential to cultural change.” Human Rights Commission access outside the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We continue to track progress publicly through our comprehensive implementation plan, a detailed road map that Canadians can see and follow.” Progress tracking outside the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “As noted by the external monitor, Jocelyne Therrien, there has been significant effort and meaningful progress,” External monitor’s assessment of broader work, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “but she also reminded us of something important.” Framing for a general point, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “This work is never finished.” General comment on the work, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Creating a respectful and inclusive workplace is an ongoing commitment.” General commitment, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “It is one that requires sustained leadership, accountability and commitment.” General commitment, not the bill.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We owe this to the women and men of the Canadian Armed Forces.” General sentiment, not the bill’s content.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “We owe this to all Canadians.” General sentiment, not the bill’s content.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Let us continue this work together.” Exhortation to colleagues, not the bill’s provisions.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “Let us get this done for them.” Closing exhortation, not the bill’s provisions.
Respect · no score
Not checked: graded before this measurement existed. Excluded from the average.
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Clarity · 96
2 of 76 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Vague promise A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible. What the tags mean → “We are undertaking meaningful reforms” Names no measure, date, or success condition for the claimed reforms.
Unearned certainty Something stated as certain with nothing to back it. What the tags mean → “I can assure members” An assurance substitutes for any source or evidence of the commitment.
Echo · 1 repeated line
Words members of Parliament keep repeating, found by the same rule for every member. No score depends on it.
“All new charges of sexual offences under the Criminal Code have been brought in the civilian justice system.” Said 4 times by 4 members. Every time it was said →
Claims · 11
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “Bill C-11 would remove CAF jurisdiction over Criminal Code sexual offences committed in Canada” Bill C-11 would remove Canadian Armed Forces jurisdiction over Criminal Code sexual offences committed in Canada. search
2 “This reflects the practice already in place since 2021, following the interim recommendation of former Supreme Court justice Louise Arbour” Since 2021, sexual offences in Canada have been handled by civilian authorities, following an interim recommendation by former Supreme Court justice Louise Arbour. search
3 “The interim directive to implement recommendation five has been in place since December 2021” The interim directive implementing Arbour’s recommendation five has been in place since December 2021. search
4 “since then, all new charges of sexual offences under the Criminal Code have been brought in the civilian justice system” Since December 2021, all new charges of Criminal Code sexual offences involving CAF members have been brought in the civilian justice system. search
5 “Bill C-11 also advances key recommendations from former Supreme Court justice Morris Fish” Bill C-11 advances key recommendations from former Supreme Court justice Morris Fish. search
6 “strengthens support for victims by expanding access to liaison officers” Bill C-11 expands victims’ access to liaison officers in the military justice system. search
7 “aligns military justice legislation with recent amendments to the Criminal Code regarding offenders and publication bans” Bill C-11 aligns military justice legislation with recent Criminal Code amendments regarding offenders and publication bans. search
8 “this week the Canadian Armed Forces reached its highest recruitment in 30 years” In the week of April 23, 2026, the Canadian Armed Forces reached its highest recruitment level in 30 years. search
9 “We have aligned our approach to harassment and violence with the Canada Labour Code” The Department of National Defence has aligned its approach to harassment and violence with the Canada Labour Code. search
10 “We have enabled direct access to the Canadian Human Rights Commission in certain cases” The Department of National Defence has enabled direct access to the Canadian Human Rights Commission in certain cases. search
11 “As noted by the external monitor, Jocelyne Therrien, there has been significant effort and meaningful progress” External monitor Jocelyne Therrien noted there has been significant effort and meaningful progress on the defence team’s cultural reform work. search