Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Scott Anderson

69 words · 4 sentences · 7 clauses

Replying to Kevin Lamoureux (Liberal)
“Mr. Speaker, I fundamentally disagree with the member’s assessment. I think that he undervalues the many discussions that Justice Arbour would have had with victims. We are not talking about a few dozen; we are talking about hundreds, directly, and indirectly through the Canadian Forces, we are talking about thousands. I believe that the Conservative Party has marginalized those victims. There is a reason Justice Arbour came forward with that recommendation. I cannot recall the Conservatives ever asking a question that contradicted the recommendation that Justice Arbour brought forward, and it has been there for four years. Has this member, or any Conservative, asked a question about that?”
Statement grade
C
Average 64 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 81%The question 19%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Claims · 56 wordsthe member, a veteran himself, knows very well that, in the military, with a top-down chain of command, culture can change very fast, Unearned certaintybecause it is an order-based society.Off point The Arbour report is several years old, 1and the culture did not stop to wait for the Arbour report. Right away, the military started the culture change, The question · 13 wordsand you know that very well.Unearned certainty You know that if you go back—Off point

Analysed on