← Back to the statement
Statement grade
Not graded: fewer than 4 clauses beyond the address. The scores are shown; a grade would say little. Not graded
Signal
44 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Relevance
44 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
Respect
–
Not scored Viewing ↓
Clarity
79 / 100
View details Viewing ↓
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Claims 33% Promise 16% Positioning 51%
Structure · 4 steps
Claims · 1
This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.
Mr. Speaker, Claims · 31 words because the government House leader referenced it, I understand he has just made a commitment that he would allow us to bring that document into the House and accept its tabling.1 Promise · 15 words I will take him up on that and make sure we get him that list. Vague promise Positioning · 48 words I do hope he will not just provide unanimous consent to the tabling of that document but that he also gives it to the Minister of Finance so that we can finally get the Liberals to stop causing the inflation that is causing so much hardship for Canadians. Positioning Off point
At a glance
Lost points for Vague promise Positioning Off point
Switch Claims on to list the checkable claims here.
What the tags mean →
Signal · 44
1 of 3 deductions are Signal
Signal checks whether every part makes a point, gives a reason, or asks for action. A low score means the speaker filled time with fluff, pleasantries, or attacks.
Positioning Praise, blame or attack with no claim, reason or ask in it. What the tags mean → “I do hope he will not just provide unanimous consent to the tabling of that document but that he also gives it to the Minister of Finance so that we can finally get the Liberals to stop causing the inflation that is causing so much hardship for Canadians.” Positioning: praise, blame or attack. No claim, reason or ask.
Relevance · 44
1 of 3 deductions are Relevance
Relevance checks whether the speaker stays on topic and answers the question asked. A low score means the speaker dodged the issue. Measured against the question asked.
Off point Talking about something other than the matter at hand: the question asked, or the bill, motion or speech under debate. What the tags mean → “I do hope he will not just provide unanimous consent to the tabling of that document but that he also gives it to the Minister of Finance so that we can finally get the Liberals to stop causing the inflation that is causing so much hardship for Canadians.” Turns the tabling request into a partisan claim that the Liberals cause inflation rather than addressing the business of the House
Respect · no score
Not checked: graded before this measurement existed. Excluded from the average.
Respect checks whether the speaker argued with people’s positions and records rather than attacking the people: insults, mockery, or bad motives assigned to them. Criticism of what someone did, however strong, is not marked.
Clarity · 79
1 of 3 deductions are Clarity
Clarity checks for plain speaking, clear ownership of actions, and honest limits on certainty. A low score means vague promises or evasive language.
Vague promise A promise with no date, no measure and no one responsible. What the tags mean → “make sure we get him that list” A commitment with no date, measure, or definition of what the list must contain.
Claims · 1
This list shows the factual statements you can check for yourself: the words as said, and the claim restated to stand on its own.
1 “he has just made a commitment that he would allow us to bring that document into the House and accept its tabling” The government House leader stated in the House on April 23, 2026 that he would allow the Conservatives to table their list of inflationary spending and would accept its tabling. search
