Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Yves Perron

191 words · 13 sentences · 16 clauses

Replying to Natilien Joseph (Liberal)
“Mr. Speaker, having listened to my colleague, I understand that he feels vulnerable. We know full well that a majority means stability and action for Canadians and Quebeckers, moving beyond partisan deadlocks. Why is the opposition so afraid of a majority when the national interest should take precedence over political calculations? That is the question I am asking myself.”
Statement grade
D+
52 / 100, held down by Signal
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Greeting 9%Procedure 21%Positioning 12%Reasoning 6%Anecdote 31%Claims 20%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Greeting · 18 wordsI thank my colleague for the question and I also thank him for the tone of his question.Greeting Procedure · 41 wordsIn our recent exchanges, there were comments about tone, among other things. I can see that an effort is definitely being made. However, as for the substance of the question, I am afraid I am going to have to disappoint him.ProcedureOff point Positioning · 23 wordsWe are not here to score political points. We are here to talk about the common good, the collective interest and constructive work.Positioning Reasoning · 11 wordsHowever, it is hard to be constructive without input from others. Anecdote · 60 wordsI was conducting job interviews recently, and I told the people I was interviewing that if I ask them a question, I want to hear their opinion. I do not want people to tell me what they think I want to hear. I want them to tell me what they think, because that will challenge me and help me grow.AnecdoteOff point Claims · 38 wordsI invite my colleagues to take a look at the Bloc Québécois’s voting record and actions since 2019.1 We have made it a mission to be constructive in Parliament. The Liberals giving themselves a supermajority goes against that.

Analysed on