Analysis · Debate reply · beta

Brad Redekopp

111 words · 7 sentences · 9 clauses

Replying to Tamara Kronis (Conservative)
“Mr. Speaker, I have a very simple question for my colleague. If the federal government simply upheld and met its treaty obligations, would this position be necessary at all?”
Statement grade
A+
Average 97 / 100
A score under 50 is red. Choose a measurement to see where it lost points and why; choose it again to clear.
Thanks 8%Reasoning 92%

This view breaks the statement into its steps and names what each one does.

Mr. Speaker, Thanks · 9 wordsthat is a brilliant way to pose the question.Thanks Reasoning · 102 wordsOf course, if the government was doing what it needed to, this commissioner would not be needed. What my colleague’s question does is highlight the importance, again, of action and of actually solving problems. Oftentimes, positions like this bureaucratic commissioner are ways for the government to avoid having to deal with an actual problem. That is what we have seen time and time again. One hundred per cent, if the government was actually doing what it needed to do, we would not need to be going down this road. We would have solved problems for indigenous people in Canada many days ago.

Analysed on